 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Comments:
Subject: girls tings Date: Oct 29 2005 09:31:43 AM Author: isabel armah girls are very very very cool girls are nice and last of least girls are independent Subject: The plush toys Date: Oct 02 2005 09:00:54 AM Author: Yoyo Why didnt you just interview the toys? Heres a good name for the next shoot- "Toys and their big lumps of fleshy humans they hang around with" Quality article. Subject: girls & animals Date: Sep 22 2005 02:24:52 PM Author: db This is nice. I think the girls are pretty. I could care less about exposure or white balance, let alone anyone who would. And the whole thing is great for a fashion shoot - especially alongside the simpering wank you'd see in most magazines, whatever their apparent standard. Strange how a comment box brings the Stalinist cunt out in spawny wankers. Subject: Date: Sep 21 2005 06:45:59 PM Author: sperminator the girl with the frog is best mmmmmmmmmmmmm i love her Subject: so hot Date: Sep 18 2005 08:29:05 AM Author: fashion these girls are gorgeous. every single one and theyve got this look there giving thats like be my friend. wow i wish i knew them. Subject: Fr Date: Sep 16 2005 02:15:26 PM Author: Voiceover Artist What a stupid idea for a shoot. What next? Models and their stool? Subject: out Date: Sep 03 2005 04:22:49 PM Author: sort it these are real women dick go and buy a fag mag Subject: okay... Date: Sep 01 2005 11:15:06 AM Author: me These girls are fitter than the ones in the US edition. Still not magazine quality though. Subject: dildo Date: Aug 30 2005 02:42:58 PM Author: thurston all everyone does on these comments nowadays is moan and bitch which i guess is what im doing i suck Subject: tings Date: Aug 30 2005 05:50:22 AM Author: kmg how come two of my friends have appeared modelling on this? how bizarre. Subject: Mr. Comment, Thankyouverymuch. Date: Aug 29 2005 05:04:39 PM Author: Orange faeces ben sutton bens utton bensu tton bensut ton bensutt on bensutto n bensutton bensutton b ensutton be nsutton ben sutton Urp! White Balance Exposure, Thankyouverymcuh. Subject: image quality Date: Aug 29 2005 04:09:53 PM Author: ned this is not a white balance problem or over saturation but it is in fact putting pictures on the the web in cmyk, i do hope you find this helpful for future pblications. Subject: yeah fairly poor Date: Aug 29 2005 01:26:03 PM Author: ben sutton sort out your white balance exposure you trendy motherfucker Subject: musty Date: Aug 29 2005 08:13:21 AM Author: gonzo goddammit, i would love to sniff that monkey- i bet it's been to places i can only dream of... Subject: orange faces Date: Aug 29 2005 02:44:03 AM Author: sim saturation cannot improve poor photographs |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
© 2003-2006, Vice Magazine UK | E-mail: info@viceuk.com | Site Design: Solid Sender
|