NEWSLETTER



DOS & DON'TS

Hoping you never bump into her again for the rest of your life isn’t a great feeling, but the six hours of completely insane contortionist fucking at her weird apartment with three cats is going to be pretty unforgettable. Comments/Enlarge | See all


It takes years of practice to pull "street fighting alcoholic old guy" with dignity but he's nailed it, right down to his freshly peed pants. Comments/Enlarge | See all






RELATED ARTICLES

SO, AHAB, CAN I BUM MY DOOBAGE?
Movies That Made Us Wanna Do Drugs Before...
SPIKIN'!
Sideways
, But With Smack
THE DOCUMENTARY CRISIS
Oil painting has been pursued for around ...
SURVIVAL OF THE STREETS
Snake Plissken, the Cro-Mags, and the Per...





GEORGE & MIKE KUCHAR


INTERVIEWS BY STEVE LAFRENIERE
PHOTOS BY JEFF ENLOW



In the history of experimental film, George and Mike Kuchar stand out like a luridly lit, throbbing purple thumb. Along with Jack Smith, Andy Warhol, Ken Jacobs, et al., the twin Kuchars are among the most emblematic avant-garde filmmakers of their generation. Unlike some of their more educated fellows, their careers began in 1954 when they tore the wrapping paper off an 8-mm camera on their 12th birthday. They quickly taught themselves to use it and set about shooting brilliant, exotic, absurd features starring their friends, inspired by the Hollywood blockbusters and B movies they obsessed over at their local theaters in the Bronx. George and Mike were still in their teens when, years later, serendipity brought their work to the attention of the Manhattan underground-film world, where they were championed by none other than Jonas Mekas, said scene’s godfather. Their films were also the central inspiration for another young filmmaker—John Waters refers to the Kuchars as “my heroes.” More than 50 years later, they haven’t stopped. At last count George has over 200 movies under his belt, and Mike, an illustrator and painter, continues to make video shorts starring people he meets along the path of his life.

We were going to interview them in a conference call, but as their voices sound so much alike, we realized it would be a transcribing nightmare. So let’s do George first, then Mike.




GEORGE KUCHAR

Vice: Were there a lot of big movie palaces in the Bronx when you were teenagers in the 50s?
George Kuchar:
There were a lot of theaters, and a lot of people in the Bronx went to the movies. The big one was the Paradise. It was on the Grand Concourse near Fordham Road, and that was quite a spectacular theater. It looked Roman. They had stars twinkling on the ceiling and clouds moving by. There was another theater around Southern Boulevard that played foreign pictures, Antonioni movies. I remember going there and the place was packed to see L’Avventura. And they always had a sign that said “Air-Conditioned.” You’d walk by in the summer and, man, the blast of cold air that came out of that place.

How often did you go?
Three times a week. Sometimes we’d see the same movie three times.

Do you remember the ones that made you want to make movies?
I went to see a lot of Douglas Sirk. That was like going to see work by adults. You felt like it was grown-ups making those pictures, and they really looked good. But then there were the Roger Corman pictures. They were done cheap and we thought, “Gee, it could be fun making those.” They would be double bills. Sometimes there would be pictures about Indians with Marla English, and then one of the low-budget horror movies. I used to love seeing those.

Marla English is criminally forgotten. Did you follow certain stars?
Yeah. And it didn’t have to be the big ones, sometimes it was the stars of the B movies. Or a lot of times I went to a movie because they had listed who did the music. If Bernard Herrmann’s name was on the ad, I went to the movie. I loved the sound of the score in the movie theater.

You and Mike started making movies when you got a camera for your 12th birthday. Was it expensive to process the film?
The film was $2.65, and the developing couldn’t have been more than that. You’d bring it into a drugstore, and they would process it at a place locally. But it wasn’t very good. After a few years it would crack, the emulsion would come out, and it would look like a fresco. So we would send it to Kodak. They did a much better job. A projector didn’t cost that much money in those days. They were kind of tin-looking things, with little plastic reels. If you got a better projector it could take bigger reels, so you could make longer movies.

How did two teenagers from the Bronx connect with the underground-film crowd in Manhattan?
We had friends, like bohemians or whatever they were called. A friend of mine, Donna Kerness, she was very pretty. We went to high school together, and then I started putting her in pictures. She made friends with this man, Bob Cowan, who was about ten years older, an artist. He came down from Canada with two other Canadian artists, Mike Snow and Joyce Wieland, to get into the culture scene. He was infatuated with Donna, and she introduced me to them, and they introduced my brother and me to that whole art world in New York that was going on.

Ken Jacobs helped you guys out, right?
We went to Ken Jacobs’s loft because Bob Cowan, I think, was acting in his 8-mm movies. At that time it was like a little theater there, and every Friday or Saturday night he would play underground movies. So my brother and I came with our pictures, people liked them, and we were asked to come back. Ken Jacobs told Jonas Mekas about us, and that’s how the whole ball started rolling.

Even though you were teenagers and didn’t have an art background like those other people, you were accepted?
Yeah! That place used to be full of painters and other artists making movies. We sort of became part of that crowd and began showing at the same venues, and an audience developed. But we had never known anyone like this. These were crazy people. They didn’t behave like the people we were working with at our jobs. A lot of them had never grown up. They were sort of fun, wild, and free.




1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | NEXT PAGE »



See all articles by this contributor

< PREV

Comments

Anonymous, on Sep 28, 2009 wrote:
the only physical difference is their facial hair. otherwise i would never be able to tell them apart
hemlocksociety, on Sep 25, 2009 wrote:
Saw a series of their films at Anthology Film Archives. A bunch of their friends from the featured shorts were in the audience.
crabbyappleton, on Sep 23, 2009 wrote:
whitney, you can get some of their films on Netflix. They are a ridiculous, insane time.
Anonymous, on Sep 18, 2009 wrote:
George is my teacher now at SFAI and I love his class! He is brilliant
Anonymous, on Sep 17, 2009 wrote:
Anonymous, on Sep 15, 2009, camp comes from the French se camper. I believe the first English use of the word, in print, was in Christopher Isherwood’s The World in the Evening.

This was better on Fox News.

-Justine
Anonymous, on Sep 17, 2009 wrote:
I was a student of George’s in the late 80s. My first day at the Art Institute, he cast me as Tammy Fae Baker in Evangelust. A visitor to the class might have thought the lunatics had taken over the asylum, but George’s classes were truly some of the most creative and cooperative days of my life. Of all his accomplishments, George’s best work is as teacher, and his passion and generosity are gifts to every student who opens themselves to his experience. Plus, he’s just so much goddamn fun - Viva George!
Anonymous, on Sep 16, 2009 wrote:
Whitney: The Kuchars’ stuff generally isn’t available, but check out Mike’s Sins of the Fleshapoids DVD for a truly awesome experience. It’s one of the great films of all time.
whitney, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
so where is the best place to start with their work? i’m going to use this issue as a good excuse to learn more film geek knowledge.
Anonymous, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
this guys are awesome.
Anonymous, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
i wish movie theateres were like they used to be.
dangerboy, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
when i was 12 years old i wasnt doing shit.
dangerboy, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
it seems like they just slipped into the ny underground. pretty awesome.
Anonymous, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
george kuchar wouldve been amazing to have as a film teacher.
Anonymous, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
Where did the term "camp" come from anyways? Anyone?
kennyp, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
this guys had an amazing childhood
lazy eyez killa, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
i think if i ever did any serious editing, like, cutting down from hours and hours of film like this, i would second guess myself so much it would be torture. at least filming is more reactionary at a single point in time. editing is a beautiful headache.
shep, on Sep 15, 2009 wrote:
is having john water consider you a hero a good thing? i guess so. dude’s a freak of nature though. i made the mistake of seeing pecker first, then pink flamingos.
Anonymous, on Sep 14, 2009 wrote:
"beautiful, horny, and really funny" yep, sounds like good films to me
Anonymous, on Sep 14, 2009 wrote:
I like how casually they mention hanging out with Ken Jacobs, like everyone does it...yeah I wish
Anonymous, on Sep 14, 2009 wrote:
that photograph of the two of them as kids is amazing. cute with a hint of creepy.
thedon, on Sep 10, 2009 wrote:
it mustve been wild to have andy warhol just roll into your movie screening when you were just a young dude tryin to make it.

POST A COMMENT [SIGN IN]
Hi, in case you haven't heard, you can now sign up to become a "member" of Viceland.com, which entitles you to all sorts of amazing benefits like pictures and a nickname. Click here to make your own profile. You can still comment if you don't, but you gotta do it all 'nonymously.

Name:
Comment: