Published October, 2009
See all articles by this contributor Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
It’s like a job interview where there the boss interviews you, and gets his dick out and asks to suck it, while his employees look on. If you don’t suck it, you know you will not only not get the job, but probably not get any job from all the people he knows. And if you do suck it, you will feel self-disgust.
Yeah, totally consensual. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
Seems like sexual coercion to me. If the girls don’t comply with his sexual demands, he phones their agent and complains. And the whole industry is behind him. Of course, the creepy types support him too. It’s all a bit depressing. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
He seems to get the girls drunk, and while they are vulnerable he assaults them.. and his friendly assistants cheer him on.
In the last few days he’s removed a bunch of photos from his blog. If that’s not the actions of a guilty man, I don’t know what is. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
If you don’t want to suck a priest’s cock, tell him NO. How hard is that?
Oh but I forgot, they wanted to be liked sooooo baaaaaad. Waaaaaaaahh, all they wanted was to become loved and the mean priest took ADVANTAGE of their totally non-self-centered, non-lazy desire. Those poor, poor fame-hungry boys. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
If that’s the case then every male above the age of 18 deserves to be imprisoned.
How about this one - if you don’t want to suck a guy’s cock, tell him NO. How hard is that?
Oh but I forgot, they wanted to be models sooooo baaaaaad. Waaaaaaaahh, all they wanted was to become fashion models and the mean old photographer took ADVANTAGE of their totally non-self-centered, non-lazy desire. Those poor, poor fame-hungry girls. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
Manipulating vulnerable girls to suck your cock should put you in prison, not in the pages of trendy magazines | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
Have any of you even read the piece all this r@pe horseshit stems from? At no point did anyone say "No" "I don’t want to do this" or "That makes me uncomfortable." No means no I’m fine with, but now yes means no too? Fuck off you sanctimonious frigid dykes. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
Jesus Christ, now he’s a pedophile? Calling him a rapist based on third- and fourth-hand rumors wasn’t enough for you, now he molests kids? You first-year dykes really have a thirst for blood. | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
I guess it doesn’t matter if you are a predatory pedophile. As long as you’re a hipster, then it’s ok... | | Anonymous, on Mar 20, 2010 wrote:
Because Terry hasn’t done anything that wasn’t explicitly consented to and very likely released in writing. All the "evidence" jezebel has put forward has either come from anonymous or third-hand sources and revolves around how do to "the power differential" consent doesn’t matter. Show us one story where a girl said no or I’m not uncomfortable and Terry didn’t listen. OR a story where he said "you have to do this to keep your job." So far, all I’ve seen evidence of is him being a lech, which is hardly the same as a criminal pervert.
BTW, if there’s any substance to these claims why aren’t they being taken up in a court of law instead of the court of blog. Oh right, attention. I forgot. | | Anonymous, on Mar 19, 2010 wrote:
Why hasn’t Vice said anything about how Terry Richardson has recently been exposed for sexual harassment and taking advantage of young, barely legal (if legal) models? | |
| JMM, on Mar 1, 2010 wrote:
wow. a lot of these comments are retarded. he takes pictures of real shit, that’s what makes him interesting to me. everyone is entitled to an opinion though...i guess. Terry is rad. | | Anonymous, on Jan 15, 2010 wrote:
Well he definitely got better. | | Anonymous, on Jan 12, 2010 wrote:
How much blown out shit can one man take? | | Anonymous, on Jan 12, 2010 wrote:
very average- what?. | | Anonymous, on Jan 8, 2010 wrote:
I’m a better photographer. Seriously, I am. | | Anonymous, on Dec 21, 2009 wrote:
fake - love bruce labruce instead | |
| gnarwhal, on Nov 9, 2009 wrote:
so blackface rules do not apply when you dress as a dog, got it. | | Anonymous, on Nov 6, 2009 wrote:
gristedes!! | | Anonymous, on Nov 5, 2009 wrote:
east village slums - ha, it must be hard with 3000/mo rent | | Anonymous, on Nov 5, 2009 wrote:
so that’s why heath ledger was such a good joker. he was practicing in bodegas before he was even famous! | | Anonymous, on Nov 5, 2009 wrote:
1. they don’t say in the intro that he did anything first. so why are you bitches harping on that? 2. this issue is SUPPOSED TO BE FROM 1994. do some of you really not get that yet? that’s the whole point.
wow i hate the people on the internet. | |
| halzer, on Nov 5, 2009 wrote:
if you know enough about TR to say he’s shit they you know you’re not going to like him, so fuck off. | |
| poozer, on Nov 5, 2009 wrote:
wow, so he’s not the first to take photos of his friends and junkies. who gives a rat’s ass? he takes interesting photos. they might not be ansel adams but that’s not the fucking point. if you don’t like risque, funny, personal photography then terry’s not your man. that shouldn’t surprise anyone. | | Anonymous, on Nov 5, 2009 wrote:
Who’s the girl in the shitter? Looks mighty familiar. | | Anonymous, on Nov 2, 2009 wrote:
Others did that way before him
You lot are a bit slow | | Anonymous, on Nov 2, 2009 wrote:
American Apparel too, right ? | | Anonymous, on Oct 30, 2009 wrote:
how about richard kern. | | Anonymous, on Oct 30, 2009 wrote:
terry is without a doubt the hottest photographer there is. | |
| captain cheesepuff, on Oct 30, 2009 wrote:
terry and vice have been hand in hand for years. you just figured this out? adios! | | | Next 30 comments > |
| |
