NEWSLETTER



DOS & DON'TS

Say what you will about Lauryn Hill’s unexpected comeback, but you have to admire her bravery. Comments/Enlarge | See all


These guys remind me of what vikings would have been like if they were slightly more courteous and also dressed like gaylords. Comments/Enlarge | See all






RELATED ARTICLES

GRINDING METAL
Whitehorse Test Your Patience
ISLAND LIFE
Peace and Quiet Versus The Ratrace
THOMAS CAHILL IS SAVING CIVILIZA...
We haven't really talked about the Rom...
VICE COMICS
By Radio Wada





MARY ELLEN MARK - PART 2


INTERVIEW BY STEVE LAFRENIERE


Tiny

Have you ever concealed a camera?

No. I wouldn’t be good at that. I like to be open with my camera. Most of the documentary work that I admire is from people who are open with their camera.

Click here for a slide show of Mary's work.

What else have you and Martin worked on together recently?

Two years ago we went to Iceland. We were commissioned to do a project on disabled children for the National Museum of Iceland in Reykjavík. Martin made a 40-minute film that’s absolutely beautiful. We made two trips there, photographing these children in two schools: one for profoundly disabled kids and one for profoundly to moderately disabled kids. They gave me full access and they had a big show in Reykjavík. It got great reviews, and I just assumed the show would travel, but no one in the US wants to look at it—neither the pictures nor the films.

Why do you think that is?

Because I don’t think there’s an interest in strong documentary work now. It’s so centered on surface here.

I will say, though, that documentary film has made quite a reentry to the stage in the last five years—but mainly in the form of advocacy or propaganda.

But this is advocacy in its own way. It’s sort of a love story about these people and their little boy—it’s beautiful. If you’re ever in the neighborhood, come by and we’ll show it to you. I wrote letters to so many museums and they all said, “Oh, this is wonderful work, but there’s no place for it with us.”

How about in Europe?

I think it’s going to show in Scandinavia. They’re much more open and interested in documentaries.

I’ve actually seen this work and I think it’s extraordinary.

I thought the project was really powerful and universal—it touches everybody. And when you have this kind of passion about something and you want people to see it and nobody in this country wants to look at it, it’s very disheartening.

Well, you know, it’s the keepers of the gates that say that, because there are probably a lot of people in this country who would like to see it.

Everything is so commercial.

Speaking of commercial, I’m trying to understand the whole monograph industry. Does the photographer make money from monographs or does the publisher make money?

You don’t make money. The only way you can make money as a photographer is to do commercial work. Even with magazines, you kind of only get by. And I’ve never been a commercial photographer. Probably the most commercial book I’ll ever do is the one on film sets, and not just because of my pictures but because I got some great people to write about being behind the scenes: Mike Nichols and Helen Mirren and Tim Burton and Buck Henry. They wrote beautiful things about their experiences behind the scenes. The writing is amazing in it. I’m so honored that these people agreed to write for this book.

That does sound like something that will sell very well.

It’s my first really commercial thing, and I didn’t do it to be commercial. I did it because I had all these pictures, and someone gave me the idea to ask some of the people I know or had worked with to write something. And I didn’t want them to write about me—it had to be about their experiences. A couple of pieces are very funny and insightful and interesting. It’s the first book I’ve done that maybe has a chance of being commercial. The other work I do because I have to do it, because I love to do it.

You’re also teaching photography, right?

I do a workshop at the International Center of Photography in New York. I’ve worked there for 14 years. I also do workshops in Mexico a lot.

I assume that most of the students are on the younger side.

Not necessarily. What’s amazing about these workshops is that some people have taken the class ten times. They range in age from 16 to 60, and they range in jobs from cinematographers to businessmen. There’s also a woman who’s an airline stewardess who’s learned to take amazing pictures. And there are people from Norway, people from Australia—people from all over the world come.

What level are they at when they come in?

They can be at any level. They just have to want to do it.

So do people go out and shoot things and come back?

They have to go out and shoot, but not en masse. They have to go out by themselves. I look at everyone’s work the first day. I have a wonderful assistant who’s a great Mexican photographer and we find each person a separate assignment that could be good for him or her. It’s a ten-day workshop. They go out and shoot for about seven days. I make appointments with them every morning and individually look at their contact sheets, which I mark up. They go and process the film at night. There’s a woman who took the class who I swear was schizophrenic, but she took great pictures. There’s a whole range. It’s a great class. We make a book at the end.

Do you ever go out on assignment and come back with nothing? Are there failures, or does it at least turn into something else?

Well, I’ve had failures in the sense that… Let’s see. Recently—and I’m not going to say who it was for—I did a portrait assignment that I thought carried into a documentary subject so I did it as a documentary subject. I happened to get a picture out of it that I love, so that’s fine. But the magazine didn’t want it. It’s very painful when that happens.

How long have you actually gone without having a camera in your hands?

Well, when I’m out on the street I don’t have a camera on me. I don’t work all the time. Like today I’m in the studio and I have tons of things to do. Sometimes a month can go by where I don’t use a camera. But when I teach, especially in Mexico, I’m very frustrated because I don’t have the time to take pictures. I try to go out a little bit, but with so many hours of teaching it’s really hard.

There is a quality in your photos that gives me the feeling that I’m not looking at a picture but instead that I’m really seeing that person in front of me and I have a relationship with them. It’s very unusual.

That’s what I try to do, but it’s hard with documentary work. It can also be hard with subjects that are tough to take, because sometimes people don’t want to look at them. But I think that everyone has a right to be seen.


MARY ELLEN MARK | 1 | 2 |

See all articles by this contributor

< PREV

Comments

Anonymous, on Aug 21, 2008 wrote:
AWESOME!!!!!! i love it when vice does stuff thats culturally important. that’s why i like this magazine in the first place.
Anonymous, on Aug 11, 2008 wrote:
These photogs are exploitative yet good.
Anonymous, on Aug 10, 2008 wrote:
I hate how rich people photograph poor people and call it reality
Anonymous, on Aug 9, 2008 wrote:
Some of those photographs are absolutely incredible.
What is it about these experienced documentary types though? They always seem so dead. There’s something missing, they’re like human bricks. They’re a defensive bunch as well, always talking about how everything is so "superficial" or "surface" orientated in the media. They are image makers who claim to be something else. I find it intriguing but many of the documentary filmmakers and photographers I’ve met claim to be principle driven, but make their living from the most superficial and fleeting activity. Photographs are always just an image. These people get so obsessed that they can’t stop finding new subjects to fulfill their appetite. I find it just as exploitative as anything else. Where is the poetry in their work? They steal it (some better than others) from their subjects. They’re like emotional vortexes.
Anonymous, on Aug 9, 2008 wrote:
ummmm whats with the racist comments being aloud to stay up?

bored barista you are obviously a fuck wit.
J.M.Stick, on Aug 7, 2008 wrote:
Wow, powerful stuff.
Anonymous, on Aug 7, 2008 wrote:
How about instead of comparing her work to fashion and skateboard photographers you pick some contemporary photojournalists.
Anonymous, on Aug 7, 2008 wrote:
amazing work. really great.

compare this to the majority of stuff on this site..the odells and photos of neckface...and wonder what happened.

Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
i like it when couples are creative and functional together.
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
i’ll say again.

tl;dr
Bored Barista , on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
Is mary ellen mark a native american? If so the rest should follow her lead. In other words, put down the bottle and pick up a camera.
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
Mmmmmm...

Finger on the trigger with the gun pointed straight at your other hand. Nuttin’ like a li’l gun safety!
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
MEM is pretty special. She’s a tough lady that sticks to her guns. And you will never take better pictures than her...so respect!
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
i wish mary ellen mark weren’t a little scary lookin
Garbage Dick , on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
those icelandic photos scare the shit out of me
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
this is stuff is so real it looks fake, like rat and mike look like they’re in a scorsese movie about pre-teen gangs who put potatoes in tailpipes and superglue on door handles. except somehow they found a gun in the dumpster and now they’re ready to take things up a level and KILL!
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
tiny breaks my heart.

POST A COMMENT [SIGN IN]
Hi, in case you haven't heard, you can now sign up to become a "member" of Viceland.com, which entitles you to all sorts of amazing benefits like pictures and a nickname. Click here to make your own profile. You can still comment if you don't, but you gotta do it all 'nonymously.

Name:
Comment: