Anonymous, on Aug 21, 2008 wrote: nice 1 |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 20, 2008 wrote: i love butts - taco jr. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 20, 2008 wrote: wow..... i want to touch once them
|
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 18, 2008 wrote: sweet |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 17, 2008 wrote: lets see some vag |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 16, 2008 wrote: Seriously, you’re having a problem with tasteful nudes? Go back to preschool. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 16, 2008 wrote: Thanks for this. I’ve always had a conflict of interests, as I’m way too hip to buy FHM, but I’m still a total sexist dickwad with no erotic imagination. You’ve just solved my conundrum! Yay! |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 14, 2008 wrote: Too hetero for me. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 12, 2008 wrote: where are more pics of the blonde in the second row? please? |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 12, 2008 wrote: i want blondy |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 12, 2008 wrote: i want your wife |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 11, 2008 wrote: Love the hair on the blonde,pretty. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 10, 2008 wrote: beautiful, i would like to touch them ... |
 |
| vagina, on Aug 8, 2008 wrote: favorite article ever!
8D |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 7, 2008 wrote: I would retouch them. I enjoyed touching them in the first place, why would i not retouch them. i would retouch them again and again.......mmmmmmmmmmm |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote: I set the butt as my desk top |
 |
| glasseye, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote: The "wife" is my favorite. I hate golden oak. Where’s the cherry wood when you need it. What’s with the same eyeliner makeup on all the girls? Did they share the pencil just before the shoot? |
 |
| glasseye, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote: I agree the girls are beautiful, but a lil boring for sure. I don’t like the idea of retouching for this shoot because it just makes it more boring. I’d like to see more from Vice. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 5, 2008 wrote: I’ll have you know...my image was not retouched...;) |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 5, 2008 wrote: Show me love. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 4, 2008 wrote: i am offended |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 4, 2008 wrote: i love their hair and their tits. us women are so much better looking with our clothes off! |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 3, 2008 wrote: Retouching credit, why didn’t you just photoshop them? |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 3, 2008 wrote: middle one is a goddess |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 1, 2008 wrote: these are gorgeous, and i don’t even like tits. |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 1, 2008 wrote: Bottom left.
First stop, Bonersville. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 31, 2008 wrote: Ok, seriously, what the fuck, do I have the longest breasts in the world or what? After looking at these I feel like one of the mothers from a trade aid advert. How the fuck does this work, I’m only 17, they, huh? so confuseddd!!!!!! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 31, 2008 wrote: It’s great how it says they’re retouched, thanks for letting us know that we’ll never know whether these women are really as "perfect" as these photos claim. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 31, 2008 wrote: WOMEN ARE GREAT, HUH! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 31, 2008 wrote: Vice is basically a sad pretentious little ladsmag. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 30, 2008 wrote: slags |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 29, 2008 wrote: Um, I need to clean my monitor. Again. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 29, 2008 wrote: Where are there well-shot nudes in the rest of mainstream media? I like these. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 29, 2008 wrote: wow, how mundane. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 28, 2008 wrote: is vice supposed to be an innovative, cultural organization that is fighting mainstream meadia? if so, you guys aren’t doing a very good job |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 28, 2008 wrote: Looks like 1978. Where’s Farrah? |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2008 wrote: i need a tissue, quick!
all i can say... I LOVE ART. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 26, 2008 wrote: why are all of these out of focus? |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 25, 2008 wrote: i think i know those girls |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 25, 2008 wrote: shit. I have taken naked photos of women about 50% as ....... (sexychic) as this and that was an experience I don’t think I could ever sleep again if I did this shoot |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 25, 2008 wrote: Gigili!!!!!!! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 25, 2008 wrote: any of those women could have whatever they want from me. i think i speak for many men when i say i am weak as fuck for that kind of beauty. long as they dont sound like a pikey. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: I wish vice would take naked pictures of not-so-cliche-skinny-ho-bags so we could all realise its not about our outer cellulite (or lack of?) but the inner emotional cellulite that truely makes us sexy as hell |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: what is the point of this? |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: holy fucking shit. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote:
one of that brunettes butt cheeks is bigger than he other
because of how she’s standing, idiot. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: The best
|
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: Stop whining/criticizing/choosing:
ALL naked girls are ace.
|
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: i’d be interested to know how much the pics were retouched. i thought vice was about real people....maybe i thought wrong
|
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: They are all gorgeous girls/photographs!
dunno who is your wife but u are a lucky Mot£$%+*ker! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: RETOUCHING?
fhm |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: There all the same figure!! same size! breast! honestly look around abit more please! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: way too much retouching... and the girls are too insipid looking for Vice, too elegant for FHM, and too bland for Vogue. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: your photos sucks. go back to your wife |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: My wife’s got nicer tits than this. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: I’d do all of them |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: When did Vice get taken over by FHM. Pricks. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 24, 2008 wrote: let me know which one’s the wife, i’ll take it from there |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote: one of that brunettes butt cheeks is bigger than he other |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote: perhaps flesh is a bit much to those who have some growing to do? i believe they are beautiful!!!! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote: beautiful!!! to say the least |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote: agree with anonymous here. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote: Flesh is disgusting |
 |
| holly marie, on Jul 21, 2008 wrote: all of a sudden my boobs feel saggy and rubbish |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 21, 2008 wrote: h-o-l-y -s-h-i-t-e! |
 |
| Nikki IX Lives, on Jul 20, 2008 wrote: That’s a hot longboard in that last photo. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 20, 2008 wrote: norms. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 20, 2008 wrote: wow dude
|
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 20, 2008 wrote: which one is your wife you lucky bastard |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2008 wrote: how old is the bardot look alike?? 15 yrs or wht |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2008 wrote: hot damn tht light brunette (large pic)is breathtaking!!! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2008 wrote: these inspire both envy and latent lesbian sentiment |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2008 wrote: They’re all absolutely beautiful, but the woman with the mole to the right of her lips is completely breath-taking. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2008 wrote: vice: this is what you do well. |
 |
| AWSM!, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Let her let me we did an in vitro? |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Your wife is fucking gorgeous. Lucky motherfucker. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: God Lives on earth |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: I’m into that one girl with the 60s stewardess short hair in a weird, uncomfortable sort of friend’s mom way. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: AMAZING!!!!! THIS GUY SHOULD DO A NAKED VICTORIA"S SECRET CATALOGUE!!!! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: where the fuck are the fat chicks? man vice is slippin’! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: if you don’t like looking at these photos that means you don’t like beautiful women, and that means you are a sad sad sad sad motherfucker |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: But they aren’t clothed and they’re good photos to boot. What kind of criticism is that anyways? "These don’t belong here because if they were different they’d belong somewhere else?" |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Why is this in Vice? They look like they would be in Vogue or Elle if they were clothed.
I’m bored. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: The one wearing the wedding ring=wife
unobservant cretins |
 |
| Bane, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: wouldn’t kick them out of bed |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: boners |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Which one? |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: jesus fucking christ that brunette is a goddess |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Wow, actual real boobs. Excellent! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Did you seriously just make a remote control joke? What are you, Henny Youngman? |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Retouching sucks. |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: So... ummmm... what’s your wife’s number and when are you going out of town on that business trip? |
 |
| Andi-b, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: I take it the wife is the one holding the remote just to keep her happy for a change.
Nice women, married or not.. All beautiful with or without clothes. |
 |
| James Alexander, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Well aren’t they a group of pretty’s! Makes me miss the girlfriend |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: Very nice! |
 |
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote: :) |
 |
|