Anonymous, on Aug 12, 2008 wrote:
aww.Its Kitties! |
 |
Anonymous, on Aug 11, 2008 wrote:
Cats were hookers in their past lives. They gulped so much jizz that they got to be reborn as cats because the universe owed them so much money. |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 8, 2008 wrote:
that little guy in the middle is the tits! |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2008 wrote:
i would not let this photographer anywhere fucking near any cat i gave even two shits obout.. it just ait right to have a thaught like that involveing cats for christ sake |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 29, 2008 wrote:
its a shame people own cats and dont let them roam about outside. instead of "whoring" themselves to humans, they should be having crazy cat sex with the massive tom cat they’re eyeing across the road, not the twat with the camera. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 26, 2008 wrote:
nice idea for a set of pictures. not sure about cat’s being like prostitutes idea but.... good work. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 22, 2008 wrote:
sometimes i touch my church on the pussy. huh? oh yeah, i already said that. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2008 wrote:
To end everyone’s argument, I have taken it upon myself to kill all of the cats in these photos.
Now carry on with your lives. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote:
awww I love them |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote:
You people are idiots. That cat is outside on the balcony. It’s not behind the glass. Look at how low the shadow of the bar is compared to the bar itself. That’s why you can’t see the cat’s shadow. Jesus H. Christmas. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote:
okay, wait a second, on second thought, look at the cat on the very lower left. the tabby in the concrete building. the very top of the building looks photoshopped. and the cat doesn’t seem to have a shadow at all of that cement balcony bar thing across it, even though we clearly see the reflection in the window.
wtf? photoshopped cats! weird. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote:
i think the calico cat is standing right in front of the glass, with the curtain behind it. vases are behind the curtain.
i.e cat crawled around the curtain to get a better look out of the window. they do that.
therefore the little bugger has less reflection.
that black cat is awesome.
|
|
Anonymous, on Jul 18, 2008 wrote:
they’we adowable! |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 17, 2008 wrote:
they’re cute! |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 17, 2008 wrote:
um. nerds. stfu about the photoshop debate. who cares? it’s just cats. mkay? |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 16, 2008 wrote:
if you open your eyes and look to the right side of the photo you’d realize that the vase is not inside the window. its something outside reflecting in so it shows on the window differently than something inside does. it shows more clearly on the left because it is more directly in front of that window than the other. there you go your all douche bags. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 16, 2008 wrote:
how lovely. :) |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 16, 2008 wrote:
It’s not ’photoshopped’. I think the photographer is standing right where the cat is, so there is less light hitting him. The vase has a reflection of a building in the distance, which has more light on it.
Makes better sense in my head. It’s easier just to call you a prick. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
i like how in most of the photos there is an element of self portrait. I would have liked to see that in all the photos, would have made the series a little more interesting and much more effective |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
You idiots, everyone knows cats don’t cast reflections. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
This is the stupidest "photoshopped or not" argument of all time. It’s a cat in a fucking window. |
|
| bonerdreamz69, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
Oh wow, you weren’t kidding. Click on the picture and look at the cat’s tail. If you follow the reflected pattern of the bricks from where they’re more clearly visible against the curtains you can see it continue across the tail. Now do the same thing with the reflected window treatments above the cat’s head. They’re faint, granted, but they are there. The reason they are more pronounced on the vase is because it is situated farther from the window than the cat. Boggles the mind how the people with the worst understanding of basic optics are always the first to call hoax on photos. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
Well, ’Bonerdreamz,’ why don’t you take a look at the fact that the cat has no reflections in front of him like the vase that is right next to him. If you had ever left you house, you might know that when a cat is in a window, you usually can see the same reflections infront of him as the rest. Douche. |
|
|
| bonerdreamz69, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
Are you kidding, you think someone photoshopped a cat into a window? Maybe it’s been a while since you left your house or something, but seeing a cat sitting in a window is not exactly what we’d call an improbable occurrence. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
aha i love this, love raymi |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
the calico cat in the second one down on the left is really blatantly photoshopped in. I suspect bottom left is also photoshopped. Sorry to the photographer if that was supposed to be ironic or something and I didn’t get it. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
bottom right = not to be fucked with! look at them ears! |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
i like top right because he’s "pensive" |
|
| Whatsername, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
that ’s funny shit
Hells yeah top left killed it
WORD AS BOND I LOL |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2008 wrote:
Kitties!!! |
|
| Next 30 comments > |
