NEWSLETTER



DOS & DON'TS

Beam me up a $40 blowjob, Scotty! The Swedish Vulcan rent boys have landed and they’re draining gallery owners’ balls like Roto-Rooter on crank. Comments/Enlarge | See all


Let’s hear it for those super serious almost serpentine chicks that seem totally bored by your jokes but smile coyly every time a witty one seeps out. They’re so “tough love” they might as well be a spanking. Comments/Enlarge | See all






FROM THIS ISSUE

DOS & DON'TS GREATEST HITS
Dude is just chilling. He's unflappable. ...
I WANT MY DVDS
Movie Reviews - The DOs & DON'Ts Issue
HOW TO NOT CARE
Venomous Concept Can't Be Bothered
SKINEMA
By Chris Nieratko





DOS AND DON'TS OF PHOTOGRAPHY




Photo by the author

A Don't: Art school The only thing you will learn from four years of college photo classes is what not to do. You spend more time listening to anorexic rich girls talking about what a photo "means" than learning something practical like how to work a fucking camera.
Don'ts: Always taking photos, Architectural photography, ‘Advertorials.' Ansel Adams calendars, Alternative processes
Dos: Always taking photos, Aerial photos, Awkwardness, Ambient light, Automatic mode/Auto-focus/Aperture-priority



Photo by the author

B Don't: Band photos What? Why are these four guys so mad at me? And why are they standing in front of a trash-strewn vacant lot? Who are you guys, a tough gang from the bad part of town?
Nope, you are every fucking band ever, and you are so boring to look at it makes me dizzy.
Don'ts: Black & white, Blurry photos on purpose, photos in/of Bathtubs, Burning (and dodging), Bums, Brooklyn, Blinking
Dos: Blogs, Breasts, Bunny ears (when you hold up two fingers behind someone's head in a photo)

C Don't: Cyanotypes and Cross-processing Both of these are Alternative Processes, which is a required course in most college photo programs. It's like forcing a painting class to forage for their pigments amid nuts and flowers. "Alternative" means experimenting with the flexibility of the print-film process or something. Cyanotypes are all blue and splotchy. Cross-processing is where the colors are supersaturated, like that movie 21 Grams. Like using filters in Photoshop, it always looks bad.
Don'ts: Cell-phone Cameras, Cindy Sherman, Closeups, Crooked framing, saying "Cheese"
Dos: Color, Cinematographers, Collages, Cartes de visite (small portraits, about the size of a business card, popular during the 1860s)

D Do: Digital Shut the fuck up, you stupid Luddites. Digital cameras are great. It's free to take as many photos as you want; they don't take up any space; there are no stinky chemicals, negative binders, contact sheets, or lab fees; there's no dust, darkroom, or expensive paper; and you can easily send your pictures to all your friends. Go ahead and take a picture of everything you see, every second of every day, just don't show them all to me…(cont.)
Don'ts: Developer (gives you cancer), Dodging, Dry-mounting, Daguerreotypes
Dos: David Bailey, Double exposures, Dye-transfers, Dust-off, David Hamilton

E Do: Editing …because there is nothing worse than a bad edit. There are plenty of good picture-takers out there, but what makes a really good photographer is the ability to edit the million photos you took down to the 20 or 30 that make sense. They'll show the rest of it in a retrospective when you're old or dead and people give a shit about every little fart you ever mustered.
Don'ts: Enlargers, Emulsion, Ektachrome
Dos: the Electromagnetic spectrum, Eadweard Muybridge, E.J. Bellocq



Photo found by Bobby Puleo

F Do: Found photos Found photos prove that it's the photo, not the photographer, that matters.
Don'ts: Fish-eye lenses, Fashion, spelling it "Foto"
Dos: Fill Flash, Film stills, Fiber-based paper, Fog



Photo of a German by Jake Gleeson

G Don't: Germans The German canon of photography is rigid and boring. Why would a whole country share the same style and approach in a medium that has such endless possibility? What are you guys, Nazis?
Don'ts: Graininess, Gallerists, Gelatin (made from horse-hooves, in all film), Gum-bichromate processing
Dos: German engineering, Gerhardt Richter



Found photo

H Don't: Homoeroticism All these gays passing off their softcore porn as fine art has got to stop. If you want to look at naked boys, just fucking look at naked boys. Stop paying $8,000 a pop to do it.
Don'ts: Hand coloring, Holgas
Dos: Hasselblads, Homemade porn, Henri Cartier Bresson, Hidden cameras

I Do: Internet Second-best to finding an amazing print in the garbage is stumbling across some lunatic's website. The Internet is the photo voyeur's Emerald City, and Google image search is like being God.
Don'ts: Interiors, calling photos "Images," Ink cartridges, Infrared film
Dos: Interchangeable lenses, Illuminance, Infinity, Inverse square law

J Don't: Jobs Another thing they don't teach you in art school is that getting paid for taking pictures is super-fucking hard. Magazines just don't pay you. There are a million other dipshits like you out there who are willing to do it for free to get "tear sheets" for their "book." If you want to get paid you have to do ads or weddings.
Don'ts: Jockeying for position, Jeff Wall, Juxtapoz
Dos: Jpegs, Jerry-rigged cameras



Photo by Jerry Hsu

K Do: Kids Have you looked at your yearbooks from high school lately? The awkwardness and self-consciousness, the toothy smiles and horrible hairdos—kids can't hide anything from a camera.
Don'ts: Kodak Instamatics, Kitsch, Kodaliths
Dos: Kodachrome, Karlheinz Weinberger



Photo by Angela Strassheim

L Do: Large format With every douche on the planet swinging T4s over their heads, snapping away like Ron Galella every time someone breathes, it's refreshing to know that some people still lug gigantic, ridiculously expensive large-format cameras to remote locations just for the sake of grain density.
Don'ts: Long exposures, Light Leaks, Live band photos, Low resolution, Liquid Light
Dos: Leicas, Larry Clark, Lee Friedlander, Lenticulars



Photo by the author

M Don't: the "Mundane" This is one of those words that gets tossed around like a golden turd in art classes. Photographers love it because it makes things easy when they are floundering to explain a boring picture. But the fact is, if it's boring, it's boring, and there's no angle or filter or film that's gonna change that.
Don'ts: Models on the toilet (Vice has received this demystifying image at least a hundred times), Montages, Macro lenses, Magazines, Manuals
Dos: Medium format, Mug shots, Motor drives, Mega-pixels, Memories



Photo by Jason Frank Rothenberg

N Do: Nature photographers How could you ever hate a nature photographer? They're technically brilliant and brave. They sit around in a wet, mosquito-filled bush for days or weeks just to get the tiger yawning or the beetle mating. How serious is that?
Don'ts: Nan Goldin, scratched Negatives, Nylon, Night photography (as a genre)
Dos: Negative scanners, Natural light, Nudity, Nostalgia

O Don't: Overexposure Overexposure means two things in photoland. The first is the technical term for when too much light reaches the film. This is caused by an inappropriately long shutter speed or an overly dilated aperture, and the result is a washed-out image. The second is when one photographer's work and life is granted too much press and attention. This often leads to a succession of alcoholism and early death. (Ever heard of Robert Mapplethorpe or Diane Arbus?)
Don'ts: Objectification, Oversaturated color, Old black man's fingers as he plays the guitar (an image we've gotten almost more than the hot girl on the toilet)
Dos: Old magazines, Optics



Photo by Angela Gaimari

P Don't: Posing "OK! Everyone get in here! Come on, guys, squeeze in. Let's go, tallest to shortest! Mary, put your arm around Charley—just do it, don't argue! Jimmy, stop making that face. Come on now, guys, grow up. Let's do this together. Mark, stand a little closer to Jen, that's it. Now, OK, hold still everyone. ‘Wally World' on three. Ready? One, two, three…Wally World!"
Don'ts: Photoshop, Panoramics, Parallax, Pushing and Pulling, Photograms, Pinholes
Dos: Porn, Postcards, Polaroid, Photo albums, Photo booths, Point-and-shoot cameras, Picture day at school



Photo by Mark Murray

Q Do: Quick reflexes Good photographing is like a sport. You have to be fast, strong (cameras are heavy as shit), agile and hyperaware. It's no coincidence that Spider-Man is such a good photographer.
Don'ts: Quick prints (expensive and look like shit)
Dos: Quick load (a godsend)



Photo by the author

R Don't: Road trips Emo kids have sold this romantic ideal and ultimate picture-taking bonanza so far down the river that now, on its back in a jagged script the whip scars actually spell out: Who cares?
Don'ts: "Reportage," Retouching, the Rule of thirds, Red-eye-reduction flash setting, Reflections
Dos: Rolleiflex, Robert Frank, Rangefinders, Richard Prince, Roni Horn



Found photo

S Don't: Sports photos Just like live sports, sports photos are about watching the same people in the same places wearing the same clothes do the same thing over and over again.
Don'ts: Soft focus, Stop bath (Smells like eggs), Sepiatone, Self-portraiture, Sprocket holes on prints, Stock agencies
Dos: Snapshots, Stealing Souls, Slide Shows, Self-timers, Stereographs, Starburst filters, Slaves, Sally Mann

T Don't: Text Please don't write on your prints, or scratch words into your negatives, or project text through the slide, or whatever. Has that ever been done well? Writers aren't illustrating their books with bad photos, are they? So don't illustrate your photos with bad writing. You can't just throw in some words to beef up a boring photo. Words are a whole other world that you and I know nothing about.
Don'ts: Tripods, Thin negatives, Timed exposures, Tints, Toning, Tungsten
Dos: Telephoto lenses (for spying), Terryrichardson.com, Three-d, Tintypes



Photo by the author

U Do: Us Weekly The photography in Us Weekly is like a cheap, super hot whore who rubs your feet and swallows your load. It perfectly serves its purpose: to be entertaining, informative, and disposable.
Don'ts: Underexposure, Used equipment, Unipods
Dos: Underwater photos, Ultraviolet light



Photo found by Bobby Pulio

V Don't: Vacation photos Of all the sterling silver that is dug up in the world by underpaid, zombified miners, the largest percentage goes to making film (true). So, even though the swimming pool at the Chateau Shamrock was in the shape of a shamrock, no one needs to see the whole roll of film you went through on it. You just wasted what some poor Mexican lost three fingers digging up.
Don'ts: Variable contrast paper, Vignetting
Dos: Vaseline on the lens, Vistas



Photo by Balarama Heller

W Do: War photographers All the way up to Vietnam, these motherfuckers were basically shooting guns and film at the same time. They were war heroes and artists and would inevitably end up getting shot in some hard-to-pronounce place and left to rot in a swamp.
Don'ts: Wide-angle, Wedding photographers, White Walls, Web designers
Dos: William Eggleston, Wolfgang Tillmans, Walker Evans

X Don't: X-treem anything No matter how wide-angle your lenses go, you fucking EXPN, tri-hawk-sporting, scar-bragging, tattooed "adrenaline junkies" can never see how extremely embarrassing you are to the rest of us. You combine every annoying aesthetic and then "Turn up the volume!" until we can't even see you against that fucking graffiti backdrop.
Dos: X-ray vision

Y Don't: Photographing Yourself The majority of self-portraits are annoying and bad because humans are far too self-aware to photograph themselves in any sort of candid, honest way. Everyone puts on their photo face (usually mopey, serious, or blank), squints their eyes, and tries to look timid, shy, sensitive, and/or tough. It's really gay.
Dos: Yearbooks



Photo by the author

Z Don't: Zooming in You are not blowing anyone's mind with your vivid closeup of the intricate textures of that tree bark. Your photo of the S from the stop sign is not poetic. Yes, the ant looks big because you zoomed in, but no, that's not interesting. Don't tell us you were trying to broaden the viewer's perspective. If you think that is broadening anything, you are a simpleton, and you should get back to filling in all spaces in the letters in your Intro to Photo guidebook.
Dos: the Zone system


ANSEL EGGLEFRANK

See all articles by this contributor

< PREV

Comments

Anonymous, on Dec 28, 2009 wrote:
You don’t deserve the name Ansel! Mr. Adams would be very offended if he were alive.
Anonymous, on Dec 28, 2009 wrote:
Can u be any more stupid?!?!?!?!?! Do’s: Breasts....WOW! Pervert! What the heck is wrong with you? And You CAN do black and white!
Anonymous, on Nov 21, 2009 wrote:
This was the most self contradictory piece of shit article I’ve ever read.
No to film but yes to large format and hasselblad? No to alternative processes but yes to tintypes? Of course you like Terry Richardson, Porn, and yearbook style images. You didn’t go to art school so you have no idea what good photography is or looks like. (not that its a requirement, but this guy should have considered it)
Oh, and No to jobs? If someone isn’t being supported by their wealthy parents or have a trust fund but wants to live as a photographer they need to take jobs. Even the shitty ones, because they love taking pictures more than taking pictures on occasion.
Anonymous, on Aug 31, 2009 wrote:
Ansel Adams bad / Zone system good? Well you obviously win.
Anonymous, on Aug 31, 2009 wrote:
Soft focus is a don’t but vaseline on the lens is a do? Apparently artistic integrity means knowing lots of buzz words but not being sure what order they go in.

Anonymous, on May 28, 2009 wrote:
RAW is okay when used correctly and not for quote unquote cheating. Did you see the exposé of a recent important photojournalism contest that was suspended because all of the submitted images had been photoshopped so severely from the original RAW files?
Anonymous, on May 28, 2009 wrote:
I enjoy reading posts like this. Not really for the insight that a person has, but for the slander everyone else throws at eachother. I really do enjoy people the fact people still think that RAW is for people who can’t judge proper exposure. It is a lossless file format that saves ALL information unlike TIFF or JPG, which everytime you open the image it archives lost information and replaces some pixels using nearest neighbor, depending on editing software and OS. Some people just shouldn’t speak.
Anonymous, on May 23, 2009 wrote:
Recommend this writer find and read a short essay entitled "A Note on Ipsety" by William Henry Ivins -- a former head curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NY. Way former. Turn of the century. No, not this one, the one before that. Sheesh...

Past that I will only say that the price of cool is conformity. Or at least it is by these lights. As a number of others have posted here, fuck this shit. Do what you want and love it.
JSturges
Anonymous, on May 16, 2009 wrote:
why the hate??
Anonymous, on May 8, 2009 wrote:
RAW is for people that can’t take good photos to make them look good later. And for that horrible horrible horrible thing called HDR.
Anonymous, on May 8, 2009 wrote:
these comments are all written by hipsters telling every other hipster to shut the fuck up because their format or style is better than someone else’s. Including this one. Fuck your digital cameras and digital exposures.
Anonymous, on May 8, 2009 wrote:
Do JPEG, are you kidding? Anybody who knows anything about photography today does RAW.
Anonymous, on May 8, 2009 wrote:
Ansel is blowing smoke up his own arsehole, and the desperation is really showing. The visual result of following this advice would be the equivalent of an American Apparel ad, samey psuedo-sleazy bullshit pretending it has artistic merit...... snooze.
Anonymous, on May 7, 2009 wrote:
whoever wrote this is a fucking dolt.
Don’ts: anything awesome
Do’s: blah blah polaroid hipster faggy bullshit lemme drop some pretentious art fag names here.
you suck bitch
Anonymous, on May 6, 2009 wrote:
jpeg? yeah, i fucking love archives.
Anonymous, on May 5, 2009 wrote:
Shit photos, nothing more. But this is vice.
Anonymous, on May 4, 2009 wrote:
Way to go, Ansel Egglefrank.
Anonymous, on May 4, 2009 wrote:
Vice, I dont like you too much, but this was decent.
Anonymous, on May 4, 2009 wrote:
Hahahha. oh, you kids. you’re missing the point.
Anonymous, on May 2, 2009 wrote:
this article is a crock of shit. like this whole magazine. eat a bag of dicks, hipster!
Anonymous, on May 1, 2009 wrote:
hey douches i’m sure you’re all here to complain about digital and blahty fucking blah. "oh but film is so much better. it’s ’real’ photography." fuck you, try and tell me the canon g9 or g10 doesn’t take better shots than your fucking yashica or whatever hip camera you have. anyways, the olympus xa’s take way better shots but haven’t been picked by the cool kids as their thing. i guess taking quality photos for a tenth of the price just isn’t cool enough.
Anonymous, on Apr 30, 2009 wrote:
this is retarded. worst article ever.
Anonymous, on Apr 30, 2009 wrote:
lame lame lame.
groverwatts, on Apr 30, 2009 wrote:
i too started reading this in earnest. then i realized this guy is talkin out his ass. do what you want. fuck it. its advice like this that has everybody doing the same shit. ITS ALL BEEN DONE ALREADY JUST MAKE SURE YOU TRY TO DO IT BETTER THAN THE LAST GUY. jeesus.
Anonymous, on Apr 30, 2009 wrote:
heh i was reading in earnest at first but after all the contradictions this is really just a subjective list of the author’s pet peeves and biases. still funny though.
Anonymous, on Apr 30, 2009 wrote:
It seems like the author is trying to validate himself.

It’s like saying, "Art school is fucking gay because I didn’t want to waste my money and my 4 years on it."
Anonymous, on Apr 25, 2009 wrote:
i can afford a holga, not a hasselblad. sorry. i’m lame.
Anonymous, on Apr 20, 2009 wrote:
oh vice mag, always contradicting yourself. this is probably the best article that’s ever graced the virtual pages of this magazine.
Anonymous, on Mar 14, 2009 wrote:
Nathan Barley uses a digital camera. Nuff said.
Anonymous, on Nov 26, 2008 wrote:
<h1>Atwood:meta tolerable!Paulus skull undefined Hokan gown </h1>
Next 30 comments >

POST A COMMENT [SIGN IN]
Hi, in case you haven't heard, you can now sign up to become a "member" of Viceland.com, which entitles you to all sorts of amazing benefits like pictures and a nickname. Click here to make your own profile. You can still comment if you don't, but you gotta do it all 'nonymously.

Name:
Comment: