NEWSLETTER



DOS & DON'TS

You know boning a girl is the right decision when even God's like, "What the fuck are you waiting for? Get in there!" Comments/Enlarge | See all


Going to Europe and seeing people under 30 who don’t look like they’re wearing drugstore GG Allin costumes is such an ocular relief it’s like shooting valium into your eyes. Comments/Enlarge | See all






RELATED ARTICLES

OUT OF THE FRYING PAN, INTO THE ...
Backhanded Amnesty for Child Soldiers
VICE MAIL
Letters - The Talking Issue
THE VICE GUIDE TO AL JAFFEE
Al has been drawing comics for so long hi...
TOP O' THE MORNIN' BOYO! - PART ...
The Cops Issue



FROM THIS ISSUE

ERIK LAVOIE'S SMILE
The Mystery of That Magical Grin
DEAR DIARY
Entry: 1990
VA CHIER
Mon Esti de Calissede Tabernac de Criss d...
LITERARY
Book Reviews - The Erik Lavoie Issue



ALSO BY AMY KELLNER

REBEL GIRLS
The Time Bratmobile Hurt My Feelings
OH-OH-EYE-OH-OH
Yoshimi Rocks Nature's Ass
SPEED FREAKS AND ROBOTS
Chicks On Speed Invent A One-Button Machi...
THE VICE GUIDE TO CUTE
The A–Z on Cute

See all articles by this contributor




Photo by Danielle Levitt.



I was just talking to a fellow music writer named Jill Edmunds about our music-journalism pet peeves. Mine is the word “seminal,” a cliché adjective used to describe obscure yet influential bands. Not only is it overused, it’s also totally sexist! “Seminal” literally means “of, relating to, or consisting of seed or semen,” and it connotes creativity and originality. I mean, hello? It takes two to tango, and where would that little sperm be without a big, warm egg? I say, why not give “seminal” a much-needed rest and start using the female reproductive corollary instead? You could say things like: “Black Flag, the ovarian L.A. hardcore band” and “Cervical proto-riot-grrl band the Raincoats.”

Anyway, this all brings me to Jill’s pet peeve, which is when rock critics use other bands to describe a band’s sound. Example: “Like the Shaggs on acid!” or “the bastard child of Sun Ra and Air Supply!” My friend claims that most (bad) rock critics can’t describe what music actually sounds like except in comparison to other music. And while I agree with her, I don’t know if that’s such a bad thing.

Take Fanny Pack, for instance. I could describe to you the tempos and the rhyme schemes, and the machines used to produce the sounds. Or I could just say: “Sounds like L’Trimm.” And then you know that Fanny Pack sounds a lot like the teenage female rap duo from the 80s who sang “Cars with the Boom” and “Grab It.” You know that they’re kind of kitschy and cutesy-poo, but in a cool, fun way. You know that they’re young and dumb and full of bunnies.

Now how about if I add in the following phrases: bubblegum booty-bass, Apollonia 6 for tweens, and chipmunk electroclash, and I also tell you that their first single is an ode to cameltoe! You now basically know more about this band than everyone on the planet except their best friends and their publicists. Mission accomplished! This is but one of the many benefits of being derivative.

Most people use the word derivative to dis a band, implying that they suck cuz they’re not one-hundred-percent original. But I read a book about postmodernism and I know that nothing is original anymore! I say, “Viva la derivativeness!” Why reinvent the wheel when the wheel is pretty fucking great! Fanny Pack is a fun band to dance to! And they’re cute. Like I’m gonna be all hating on three teenage girls of various ethnicities trying to rap and have a little fun? I think not!!

AMY KELLNER
So Stylistic is out now on Tommy Boy.


FANNY PACK ON ERIK LAVOIE PIC: This looks like the kind of guy who probably speaks only French or something and not a word of English.


See all articles by this contributor

< PREV

COMMENTS


POST A COMMENT [SIGN IN]
Hi, in case you haven't heard, you can now sign up to become a "member" of Viceland.com, which entitles you to all sorts of amazing benefits like pictures and a nickname. Click here to make your own profile. You can still comment if you don't, but you gotta do it all 'nonymously.

Name:
Comment: