Anonymous, on Oct 8, 2009 wrote:
I’d fuck her three times. After that my dick hurts. I am being realistic |
 |
Anonymous, on Sep 25, 2009 wrote:
her outfit really, really sucks, but she is cute. |
|
Anonymous, on Sep 22, 2009 wrote:
Hey Vice, fuuuuuuuck yoooouuuu. If her nipples are pierced then it’s on till the mutha fuck’n break of dawn. |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 31, 2009 wrote:
what if you’re the old dude that stares silently for hours out the fourth floor retirement home windows by the elevator? then you might think differently. you know how many old-timers fall in love over tapioca pudding and calling kids whippersnappers and uttering racist remarks under their breath when they think the nurses can’t hear them anymore? do you? |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 28, 2009 wrote:
Who the fuck cares what her skin will look like in the old folk’s home? It’ll be wrinkled and gross, tattoos will be the least of her problem. At least she’s really hot now. |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 17, 2009 wrote:
Hot tamale! She’s like the bad girl version of the housewrecking secretary on Mad Men. Well, worse girl version I guess. |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 14, 2009 wrote:
She’s cute as fuck.. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 13, 2009 wrote:
this bitch is fine as fuck and i bet she’s still tight and moans without faking |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 6, 2009 wrote:
I agree with this latest comment. The tattoo boomers are going to look like total garbage when they’re in the old folks home. What am I saying? They already do now. So sad |
|
Anonymous, on Jun 30, 2009 wrote:
that chestpiece is wayyyy weird n not a good choice for a woman not committed to all things punk n wearing black fetish wear... imagine when she is in the old folks home with that shit... outfit sucks. i never see anyone in SF dress that yuck....she is pretty n just shoulda canned the tatt n worn less pretentious clothes |
|
Anonymous, on Jun 26, 2009 wrote:
it’s her body. let her do whatever she wants with it. don’t like tattoos? fine. but why the hate? in my eyes she’s a total DO. |
|
Anonymous, on Jun 22, 2009 wrote:
precious. |
|
Anonymous, on Jun 16, 2009 wrote:
Having a visible tattoo is about as bad as having an Insane Clown Posse poster in your room . |
|
Anonymous, on Jun 16, 2009 wrote:
way to ruin a perfectly good body. |
|
Anonymous, on May 21, 2009 wrote:
every guy that has posted negitive shit would still fuck her tatted twat if they had the chance ..... her puss prolly smells like palmade and antique aroma |
|
Anonymous, on May 3, 2009 wrote:
I love GOOD tattoos and those are not it. She is a pretty girl but her clothes and ink look like shit. |
|
Anonymous, on Apr 10, 2009 wrote:
Leave SF out of this. Of course you’re going to find girls like that in any tattoo shop.
The SF bashing by Vice is taken per compliment. It’s 1/15 the size and still the NYC sparring partner. |
|
Anonymous, on Mar 23, 2009 wrote:
aren’t tattoos out of fashion yet? it gets so tedious seeing people covered in tattoos. i get it. you’re unique. you’ve got tattoos just like all of your friends. yawn!!!! |
|
Anonymous, on Feb 18, 2009 wrote:
She is completely a DO, and that’s obviously a TATTOO CONVENTION, so if you were expecting a lot of non-tattooed chicks, then you’re an idiot. |
|
Anonymous, on Jan 19, 2009 wrote:
She looks like she knows what she’s doing. I award her 1 DO point. |
|
Anonymous, on Jan 11, 2009 wrote:
Chest tats scare the living bejezus out of me, I don’t know why |
|
Anonymous, on Jan 5, 2009 wrote:
I’ve never fucked a chick with anything other than some discreet little tatoo but I’d really love to fuck some circus tatoo-ed lady pin-up revival cliche type chick. Do they go for nerdy junior fogeys like me ever? |
|
| exitement, on Dec 29, 2008 wrote:
do people not understand that tattoos are (mostly) permanent? it’s like getting a flatbrim or weezer glasses surgically attach to your skull. fucking stupid. |
|
Anonymous, on Dec 25, 2008 wrote:
I live in SF and I think the caption has a lot of truth to it. For some reason, the "hip" people all have tattoos and wear checkered shirts. Like they just returned from a stint of forestry work in Oregon or something. And I’m not hating on tattoos: some girls with body tattoos that look really cool and were done with a lot of craftsmanship. But most just have some mediocre bullshit tattood on their skin. SF is weird town: most hot girls are from douchy parts of town were the fratboys and sorority girls live; the "nonconformist" creative types all seem to look the same and seem to live by the credo that uglier is better. |
|
Anonymous, on Dec 11, 2008 wrote:
Sweet jesus, and the angels in heaven, I wanna see her naked. |
|
Anonymous, on Dec 8, 2008 wrote:
girls like this are a dime-a-dozen in oakland. usually i take mine without the lame 90s/40s bullshit. |
|
Anonymous, on Dec 4, 2008 wrote:
umm tattoos are LAME. i cant even buy a painting for my house much less put some crappy drawing on my BODY for life. whats so g-damn important about that skull that you had to ink it on you? get a sketch pad and carry it around with you. and show evryone that great drawing haha |
|
Anonymous, on Nov 21, 2008 wrote:
I would hold the shit out of this girl’s hand! |
|
Anonymous, on Nov 14, 2008 wrote:
dear men who don’t like girls with tattoos,
WE DON’T CARE. you’re approval isn’t required. When we realized that all douchebags feel that the only acceptable tattoo on a girl is a tramp stamp, we all went out and tattooed the rest of our bodies like this beautiful girl.
Thank you for reassuring us that we made the right decision. |
|
Anonymous, on Oct 21, 2008 wrote:
when girls get tons of tattoos then try to dress classy it just turns to trashy |
|
| Next 30 comments > |
