Anonymous, on Oct 25, 2009 wrote:
Do
You’re too weedy, Vice |
 |
| tammy faye, on Oct 14, 2009 wrote:
he looks infected in more way than one. |
|
Anonymous, on Oct 13, 2009 wrote:
ok so this guy looks like a cock. gay and straight cocks exist. this is definitely not "a gay thing" |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 19, 2009 wrote:
agree with lazy eyes killa, you can tell gay just by the face and eyes - why does that happen, what is that? |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 13, 2009 wrote:
It looks like he’s wearing a Dickhouse button but it’s probably just a gay thing. |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 12, 2009 wrote:
What did those poor jeans ever do to him? |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 6, 2009 wrote:
haha. good caption. thanks for the giggle |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 3, 2009 wrote:
if you really think this guy gives two shits about fashion you don’t have a fucking clue. |
|
Anonymous, on Aug 2, 2009 wrote:
Gay’s are no good at telling what is going to be fashionable. They just wear shiney, bright thing’s like sartorial crow. Trust me, I’ve been down the road - it’s all horrible belts, bad haircuts, too many tattoos and piercings, and strangely, the over-repeated Black Books was right: ’the prohibitive standards of hygiene. And all that dancing!’; let alone their music tastes, anyone who likes Lady GaGa or Madonna or House music deserves an acid bath. Anyway, back to my point - gay people don’t know what to wear, they just think they do. And they should be reminded of that every day of their miserable lives. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 31, 2009 wrote:
he stole zorro’s practice jeans from the trash |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 30, 2009 wrote:
Scumnation says"I bet he has a slash in his jeans where his asshole is." |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 30, 2009 wrote:
i can’t wait! |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 29, 2009 wrote:
prints in blazers was a bad look even when it was novel. That shit is just terrible, and the combined effect? there are no words for how bad this is |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 28, 2009 wrote:
This guy is basically a collection of everything that sucks about the ’noughties’. In fact in a thousand years when AIDS and bad steez has consumed our ’civilization’ he will be a perfect picture of where man went wrong. The age of decadence is almost over fags |
|
| malathion, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
that’s a dung beetle on his fucking jacket isn’t it . if i see this motherfucker i’m gonna roll his gay ass into a ball and bury him . |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
london? |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
so does this mean his farts are smellier than normal? |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
i’ve seen lots of mohawks and i’ve never thought of them as hair stalagmites until now. thanks for ruining it. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
if rorschach hadn’t broken out of prison. |
|
| Hutch_, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
Anonymous- "Black people are usually a good barometer for what white people will be wearing a few years from now".
this isn’t 1995. White people don’t give a fuck what black people do anymore. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
yes! rave is back with a vengenance! gotta go steal my nieces pacifier. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
his hair looks like it’s full of sugar and fake blueberry flavoring. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
i hate it when i put my leg in the wrong hole in the morning but with pants like this he must spend minutes a day backing out and re aiming. |
|
| hi fructose, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
wonder what it takes for him to blow his whistle. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
somewhere there’s a nephew that thinks he has the coolest uncle ever. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
we’re still printing on blazers? ugh. |
|
Anonymous, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
Regarding the caption, are they really though? I think a more appropriate addage would be: "Black people are usually a good barometer for what white people will be wearing a few years from now". |
|
| lazy eyez killa, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
i still don’t understand how gays get their eyes to twinkle like that. changing your wardrobe is one thing but changing how your face looks is like some kind of twink adaptation that there is no scientific explanation for. |
|
| your mom, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
THE WORST! |
|
| jizzmopper, on Jul 27, 2009 wrote:
pride and prejudice. yep, he embodies them both. |
|
| Next 30 comments > |
