Why would you wait for some company to create a satellite-feed surveillance pack when you know they're just going to slap their logo all over it and make the battery a piece of shit. Just build the damn thing yourself and get to blogging every single second of every single day ever.Comments/Enlarge |
See all
Yeah yeah, we’re as sick of these shoes as the rest of the thinking world, but doesn’t she have an early Madonna as Minnie Mouse thing that makes spatswith-shorts sort of make a lot of sense?Comments/Enlarge |
See all
You were 99.9 percent of the way there and then... WAW WAMP WAAAMMMMP you sink the whole thing into the ocean with those fucking old-lady-in-Miami-Beach shoes. What is it with you people and your terrible footwear choices?
Anonymous, on Nov 4, 2009 wrote: man or mannequin?
Anonymous, on Sep 2, 2009 wrote: just bc that man has a bulge doesn’t necessarily make him a man. it’s his terrible taste in shoes. trannies have terrible taste in footwear.
kennyp, on Aug 28, 2009 wrote: you people? waddya mean you people? just kidding make fun of asians is always funny.
Anonymous, on May 15, 2009 wrote: did he ’wamp wamp’ her like the big fat night at the apollo lady?
Anonymous, on Apr 28, 2009 wrote: The constant racial innuendo is disappointing.
Anonymous, on Apr 22, 2009 wrote: I’m pretty sure the man on the left is a raging man.
Anonymous, on Apr 14, 2009 wrote: she does look like a dude. If she had cuter shoes and those bottoms didn’t look like they were wedged up her cooter it would be a cute outfit.
Anonymous, on Apr 11, 2009 wrote: um, the one with the shoes and the chanel suspenders, thats a dude. dudes. yikes.
Anonymous, on Mar 28, 2009 wrote: if it breathes and has a vagina i will fuck it, no matter how bad her shoes are
Anonymous, on Mar 24, 2009 wrote: "I would call it racially insecure hiring board syndrome, but socialogy is not my major."
well that’s lucky, because you can’t spell it.
Anonymous, on Feb 20, 2009 wrote: They just got an invitation to the "Fuck me" Party. Didn’t you know?
Cmore, on Feb 8, 2009 wrote: its wrong on so many levels
Cmore, on Feb 8, 2009 wrote: Footwear....?
I think they fucked up when they decided to step out looking like that....
Anonymous, on Jan 28, 2009 wrote: "You people"
I think they mean that all Asian girls are ugly based on the biased subset that is provided, while white girls are fitted into "Do", despite their fat rolls that, while able to break any chair in Asia, is suddenly an aesthetic advantage as opposed to um shoes. I would call it racially insecure hiring board syndrome, but socialogy is not my major.
Anonymous, on Jan 6, 2009 wrote: Those shoes rock. Shut it.
Anonymous, on Dec 28, 2008 wrote: Yeah the one on the left definitely is a male or at least a woman on seroids
Anonymous, on Dec 18, 2008 wrote: that’s because the one on the left is a GUY! duh, men can’t pick women’s shoes!
Anonymous, on Dec 5, 2008 wrote: waw wamp
Anonymous, on Nov 3, 2008 wrote: "you people" - zing!
Anonymous, on Oct 11, 2008 wrote: asian girls are always in the don’t category for a good reason
Anonymous, on Sep 27, 2008 wrote: what do YOU mean, you people
Anonymous, on Sep 12, 2008 wrote: the shoes rock, not sure if it’s a dude on the left, but I don’t care either way
Anonymous, on Sep 5, 2008 wrote: you refers to asians
Anonymous, on Aug 20, 2008 wrote: You people?! What do you mean YOU PEOPLE?!
mosquita, on Aug 9, 2008 wrote: excuse me, vice, but any of your hipster dipsters would wear those shoes. boys, too.
Anonymous, on Aug 8, 2008 wrote: Ohh my god.... I definatly don’t want a chopstick threesome, c’mon I mean, they are just plain ugly.
Lisisme, on Aug 5, 2008 wrote: You don’t earn enough in a year to buy those shoes. Eat your heart out!
Anonymous, on Jul 21, 2008 wrote: Didn’t she blew it for not wearing, uh, pants? I kinda like the shoes, actually.
Anonymous, on Jul 3, 2008 wrote: Everyone that looked at this post, thought the same thing...they would do them both in a heartbeat. Girl viewers included! Don’t deny that you wanted a chopstick threesome!
aeroblue, on Jun 14, 2008 wrote: funny how they end up in a shoot in a later issue of vice