People who think riding their bicycle is saving the world and vocalists dressed in vintage-store garbage need to all move to an island somewhere where they can worship each other as much as they want. Oh wait, they did, it’s called Williamsburg.
Subject: not relevant Date: Jan 16 2008 12:24:16 AM Author: ikta
the worst socks off 2007 competition pulled the usual crowd and as usual the nerdy child molester rocking the dirty black pulled up socks took the prize which turned out to be a free blowjob from the first guy to come to the stage
Subject: oh dear lord Date: Jan 13 2008 03:31:00 PM Author: Ribbon
jesus suffering fuck
Subject: Them Date: Dec 31 2007 04:28:39 PM Author: Me
I thought it was called Victoria?
Subject: amen Date: Nov 21 2007 08:48:18 PM Author: aaron
amen to the comment below me,
whats with people getting absurd back pieces like this? i wish i could be there to see his face when he finally realizes he's made a big mistake with that tattoo. obviously it hasn't happened yet because he's got no problem going shirtless. also, he needs to nair his shoulders. this guy is clueless.
Subject: ? Date: Nov 21 2007 11:41:43 AM Author: Sarah
"vintage-store garbage"??? that's what all the do's on this site are...
Subject: right here Date: Aug 12 2007 01:32:38 AM Author: Rashaun
This band played in my friend's living room in rural Mississippi. I was so fucked up that I passed out in the middle of their set and when I woke up they were still playing. We got real stoned and then I gave them some pot before I left. Talk all the shit you want, but Show Me The Pink are awesome people.
Just not giving a flying fuck about any thing that is even vaguely related to caring about any thing other then not dying. I wake up every day and just thank whoever that I didn't have some kind of fatal aneuryism like a class mate of mine or a pulmonary embollism. I'm just like a racoon or monkey or hawk or any other animal. I'm just trying to get to the next day without dropping dead or getting into some freak accident. George Carlin said that the earth has sufferred and withstood much worse cataclysmic disasters than us and I'm inclined to agree with him. THERE IS NO AFTERLIFE. JUST LIVE F
Subject: oops Date: May 17 2007 11:03:47 PM Author: patty p
the dude on the right kinda makes you think hes a chick without the bob, makeup and dress but look at the arms and legs.
Subject: BLOWJOB Date: May 14 2007 05:44:34 PM Author: JOHNNY
would dress a little differently, but i would go to this party.
with my bike.
Subject: back on topic Date: Apr 07 2007 10:15:32 PM Author: bob
it looks like he trims the backhair with a #4 clipper guard. thoughts?
Subject: the post below me Date: Apr 05 2007 05:29:38 PM Author: ...
lol, whut?
Subject: dasein Date: Apr 05 2007 11:34:12 AM Author: multiculturalism is here to stay
Hahaha right (not)
and what about economic inequalities? will they also magically disappear in your anti-semitic fantasies??
what are defined cultures? Multiculturalism and diversity are a blessing, because (if developed) it requires a certain openness.
Further, in regards to the pic, you vice scoundrels are stooping pretty low (as usual). Firstly, cars are evil, destructive, expensive chunks of moving metal. If you need transport, take a bus, ride a bike, skate, or walk. At least his tattoo makes a statement that you silly critics don't have the guts to make. (makes me wonder who pays you). drop your frat-loser mentality and take a long look at our planet and yourselves.
I'll see you on the other side!
dasein
Subject: JA RLY! Date: Apr 05 2007 08:20:17 AM Author: O RLY?
Talk of sustaining our envoronment is all well and good, but do you think a tumour considers the well-being of it's human host when it takes over, usually with terminal consequences?
That's exactly what we are, and our fate is sealed. When roughly 6.5 billion savages are racing each other to be bigger, better, faster and stronger, there are going to be casualties.
Don't get precious about humanity or the planet Earth; we'll kill each other before we kill anything else.
Subject: fuck the Date: Apr 05 2007 08:15:46 AM Author: police
Riding bikes is good.
Not exhausting resources is also good.
It's fuckwits like this guy who makes everyone else somewhat environmentally friendly look retarded.
Subject: JA RLY! Date: Apr 05 2007 08:02:36 AM Author: OH RLY?
"but it IS the right thing to do -- ride bicycles and stop eating meat."
Haha, how DARE anybody tell my how to sustain myself.
Subject: SIDDARTHA Date: Apr 05 2007 02:18:53 AM Author: Chachie
Yo siddartha Things were better any time YOU were not around.
And that "one less car" guy someone please kick his ass, before he puts his CHE shirt back on....
Right after posting the below post, I went to turn on the TV and what was on? Historical Viking reenactors in Denmark, living the "primitive" life. I couldn't help but think of this discourse.(let it be known that I am not faulting these guys. They're just having fun. I'm addressing the people who think that things were better back then.) The only difference between these guys and the actual thousand-years-ago Vikings is the fact that if someone gets a U.T.I. while they're doing battle (or, more likely, while they're having greasy, dehydrated nerd-orgy sex the night before), they can go to the doctor (which, as far as I know, the government there pays for)and get their sweet, sweet penicillin.
Then the show moved on to Christiania. Why is it that the better people have it, standard-of-living wise, the more they feel compelled to adopt the philosophy of anarchy? What, is the fact that the prince married a southeast Asian oppressing you? You like anarchy? I hear Charles Taylor is pretty chill on that tip.
Furtive speaks the truth. I mean, you could also say that Mein Kampf has a couple of good ideas.
Subject: RE: as if i don't have anything Date: Apr 04 2007 08:55:53 PM Author: Furtive
Instead of recommending a book with two essays and ten shitty ones maybe you should try reading something else on the subject that isn't horribly biased. People can make something up about how early man lived to a hundred in a paradise devoid of stress and illness. Cause it wouldn't be stressful gathering food in the woods to feed your family not worried about getting eaten by some other animal, being attacked by some other dude (Murder being the single largest cause of mortality) Read Guns Germs and Steel. Look up pitcairn island. Yeah you could fall cut yourself get an infection and die. Taken into slavery. Don't kid yourself. Life was "Nasty Brutal and Short"
Subject: awesome Date: Apr 04 2007 05:00:21 PM Author: kate
good job on that one.
& to foXXl--> williamsburg certainly is on an island, retard. look at a damn map. long island? have ya heard of it? what- did you think bk was stuck on conn.? go back to minnesota. thank you.
Subject: hahah Date: Apr 04 2007 02:21:36 PM Author: me
seriously, will 'one less car' guy ever live what most of us would consider a 'normal' life? i mean, he went under the needle for like 12 hours of pain for that shit. it's like that plastic surgery addicted cat-lady. shit will just never be the same for them again...ever.
Subject: Solid finish. Date: Apr 04 2007 11:29:35 AM Author: Steve
zing.
Subject: the last one Date: Apr 04 2007 11:27:22 AM Author: promise
the important thing is realizing that the way we live today is not the only way. and that it may prove to be a very recent development and brief way of life for humans.
the important thing is to realize that what we believe today may be tainted by invisible ideology, and hidden agendas -- and that it may not be nearly as rational or factual as we think.
the way we look at the world and ourselves, it may be a very limited view, which excludes multiple other ways of perceiving and understanding, which are all just as valid, if not much more valid, than ours.
this is the only way to envision a future. if there is one.
Subject: Date: Apr 04 2007 10:28:33 AM Author:
not only can I afford a car, I own one. But I still choose to ride my bike every day to work. So stop saying the only reason people ride is because they can't afford one.
Subject: . Date: Apr 04 2007 07:57:36 AM Author: .
Listen.
A) There are environmental-friendly cars.
B) Nothing wrong with riding a bike, but look at the guy, and his tatoo, and his biking shorts.
C) Riding a bike too much can make you sterile (not able to have kids). Post-delivery guys, delivering on bikes often have this problem. Them and chefs are the two main risk groups. It's not good for men.
E) You can get ecological meat in most countries now. Where they have really strict rules, and organisations checking them out, where the cows/cheep/pigs are living in good environments, running free, and not fed medicine, antibiotics....
Honestly, your anarchist guy is probably not to be trusted when it comes to a balanced view.
Most vegetarians these days seem to be anorexic chicks, because vegetarian food has a lot less energy in it.
Then of course we have the propaganda-victim leftists, who are just fooled and kind of tragic really.
Subject: I beat my meat Date: Apr 04 2007 01:14:33 AM Author: Soylent Green
Yeah, and they never ate lamb or fish in the Bible. OK.
Of the many parts of the Bible that might be hard to
believe, I have a hard time believing the Gaming Commission
got in on the action on that one. Nice.
But moderation IS key. That goes for eating and driving.
Don't drive or eat at Taco Bell when you don't have to. The
thing about meat now , though, is that 90% of it is dosed with
steroids and other fun stuff. It IS pretty gross how a lot
of what we eat is prepared. If it were pure, I would have
no problem having my meat and eating it, too.
But what's wrong with saying "One less car" or "10 items or
less" though? Isn't it the same inference as 'fewer'? I had one
less burger than you had. Big fucking deal.
Subject: as if i don't have anything Date: Apr 04 2007 12:43:05 AM Author: better to do than write this shit
the much lower life expectancy of our ancestors, i.e. in pre-civilization, pre division of labor, pre-hierarchy, pre-written language, pre-power, pre-subjugation times, being much lower than today, is another myth perpetrated by civilization itself.
think about it, zero stress. plenty of varieties of delicious, nutritious, healthy, non-toxic, raw, food available for the taking. lots of leisure physical activities. communal life where every baby growing up is intimate with many peers and adults... how long would a human being live under these conditions? I'm not going to say what i think is possible, because i'm clearly stretching the maximum bounds of many people's imaginationg already.
I'm getting a lot of this stuff from a book called "Future Primitive", published by a sub-label of Columbia University Press, by an anarchist, primitivist writer named John Zerzan. in this book, he cites and quotes, and meticulously footnotes every scientific finding, every piece of archeological, medical, biological information.
it's an easy read, and look, it's only $5.00 :
http://www.amazon.com/Future-Primitive-Other-Essays-Auto nomy/dp/1570270007/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-0807119-4553649?ie=UT F8&s=books&qid=1175664627&sr=1-1 />
I must say here that I don't necessarily believe everything he says, (please do ignore the rest of the book after the first 2 essays) but it is fascinating
Subject: bicycles. Date: Apr 03 2007 10:50:28 PM Author: alex
it's not fair to go after bike riders, vice is from montreal and i'm suprised they don't give respect to the crazy fuckers that survive the suck that is quebecois driving, much less during the winter. i'd be suprised if bigfoot harry there has ever taken a ride in anything other than optimal weather conditions.
Subject: Argh Date: Apr 03 2007 10:37:41 PM Author: Joe
Not that I want to get sucked into that whole stupid issue of what's "natural." Why the hell should that nebulous concept have any moral bearing on anything?
I refer you to John Stuart Mill:
"It thus appears that we must recognize at least two principal meanings in the word Nature. In one sense, it means all the powers existing in either the outer or the inner world and everything which takes place by means of those powers. In another sense, it means, not everything which happens, but only what takes place without the agency, or without the voluntary and intentional agency, of man. This distinction is far from exhausting the ambiguities of the word; but it is the key to most of those on which important consequences depend.
Such, then, being the two principal senses of the word Nature; in which of these is it taken, or is it taken in either, when the word and its derivatives are used to convey ideas of commendation, approval, and even moral obligation?"
http://www.la.utexas.edu/research/poltheory/mill/three/n ature.html />
There are plenty of good reasons to avoid excessive car use and meat eating, and hey, why not why not make a bid deal about it while you do it, nothing wrong with promoting a worthwhile cause. But DON'T go on about how "natural" it is, as if that means something.
Subject: but i'm bored at work Date: Apr 03 2007 10:25:17 PM Author: Joe
I'm aware that meat isn't thought to have formed as large a part of our ancestor's diets as it does ours. Fair enough. But then you go on to say:
"do some research and you will find that all transmitable diseases, also all serious illnesses such as cancer, did not exist before the advent of agriculture."
No YOU do some research and get back to us with a source. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Just to remind you, you said ALL TRANSMITTABLE DISEASES DID NOT EXIST before the advent of agriculture.
Well, Mr. Oncologist, did it ever occur to you that maybe the reason we "didn't get cancer before agriculture" is due to the fact that we only lived to be like 20?
Why must eating meat and being environmentally responsible be mutually exclusive? I think that hunting venison (one of the healthiest of meats) is great. Especially in locations where there is an overabundance of deer due to lack of usual predators (cuz we killed them. Like wolves, for example). What about places like Polyface Farms in MD, that specializes in raising animals to eat in a nice environment and slaughters them humanely?
Which brings me to the next issue. Why should we be vegetarians while lions and tigers and bears get to hunt and maul their food in a rather inhumane fashion? Should we provide all the carnivores with vegetarian alternatives? Is this about the suffering of the individual animal being killed, or the environment being out of whack?
The environment being out of whack sucks, but if I kill a deer and eat it (and make leather), what the heck? Woah, veg-heads, are you starting to possibly see shades of gray, or does that capacity leave when you have B vitamin deficiency?
Subject: this is a waste of time most likely Date: Apr 03 2007 07:35:32 PM Author: but i'm bored at work
the term "hunter gatherer" is itself a false depiction. it should actually read "gatherer hunter". because hunting provided about 1% of the food of our ancesters.
10,000 years ago was the last, relatively brief, ice age. there is ample evidence that before that, the earth was much more full of natural vegetation than now, and that thousands of kinds of fruits and leaves made up the diet of our ancesters.
do some research and you will find that all transmitable diseases, also all serious illnesses such as cancer, did not exist before the advent of agriculture.
it is sad that most people still under the spell of the lies, the false depiction of our ancesters as aggressive, violent hunters, told to justify the modern, extremely unhealthy and destructive diet.
Fuck your a moron. Our ancient ancestors were hunter gather folk living in the bush. Seen many zucchini plants or carrots in the fucking woods? Vegetarians trying to prove their lifestyle through evolutionary argument should be put on a plane and crash landed in fucking manitoba. After two days of eating pine cones they'd be beating each other to death with their nalgenes to feast on fresh brains.
Subject: this beer tastes like piss. Date: Apr 03 2007 05:33:53 PM Author: ...
since the 1970s it has been commonly accepted -- IN ARCHEOLOGICAL COMMUNITITIES.
Subject: no, no Date: Apr 03 2007 04:53:30 PM Author: really.
since the 1970s it is commonly accepted that previous pictures of our ancesters were completely wrong -- and that pre-civilized man was 99% vegetarian, for a period of about 4 million years.
this social order paints things in its own image, including our past.
we've been thinking of ourselves as the "rulers of the world" --- that is precisely why everything is fucked beyond repair, and we as a species are facing posible extinction.
80% of large fish have disappeared from the oceans in the last 30 years. 50 - 80% of honey bees in N. America have died in the past 5 years. and these all have catastrophic consequences, for the eco-system, and for humans.
our grand children will all live like the starving kids in Africa today -- no water, no food, no medicine.
and people still talk about eating meat is their god given right... global warming doesn't exist. in this kind of company i am truly ashamed to be human.
is a myth. Most scientists who disagree with it are shit scared of saying so because they usually lose their job or at least their funding. Scientists are loving all this attention because crisis= funding and without fear they are out of a job.
I suppose you think Katrina comes from people not riding their bikes more too.
Haven't you guys heard of moderation? The fact of the matter is that we are omnivores. Veganism is retarded. You know how much more nutritive value there is in a chicken egg or piece of steak than in a whole loaf of whole grain bread?
We became who we are (rulers of the world) because of meat eating (that's when our brains got all bigger and stuff). Back then, though, we didn't eat it three times a day, and we had to exercise our butts off to get it.
Fish is so good for you (when it isn't filled w/mercury) that it's ridiculous!
Vegans would die in the wild. What the fuck would they eat? You can't get TVP in the woods.
And finally, the word "Myriad" means "many". Would you say "I have a many of ideas"? No. So keep that in mind. "I have myriad ideas" is correct.
Oh, and, finally (for real this time), it should be "One Fewer Car" (just like it should be "ten items or fewer", the lane in the market, I mean). Way to go bio-punks, keep it dumb AND grammatically incorrect.
it costs 100 times more to produce enough grain to feed cows for meat than to simply grow vegetables for human consumption. also a staggering percentage of deforestation is caused by the beef industry needing more and more grazing ground for their herds.
I'm not 100% against eating meat once in a while. but the over-indulgence, the sheer AMOUNT of meat people eat is just fucking disgusting.
and i'm not even going to get into the myriad of health problems caused by over-consumption of cooked animal protein.
go read up on this stuff. everone should know what effects thier choices have both on the world as well as their own body.
oh and recent anti-global warming propaganda is all paid for by oil companies.
There is, too, the fact that we humans have been eating animals as long as we have lived on this earth. Humans may not need to eat meat in order to survive, yet doing so is part of our evolutionary heritage, reflected in the design of our teeth and the structure of our digestion. Eating meat helped make us what we are, in a social and biological sense. Under the pressure of the hunt, the human brain grew in size and complexity, and around the fire where the meat was cooked, human culture first flourished. Granting rights to animals may lift us up from the brutal world of predation, but it will entail the sacrifice of part of our identity -- our own animality.
Surely this is one of the odder paradoxes of animal rights doctrine. It asks us to recognize all that we share with animals and then demands that we act toward them in a most unanimalistic way. Whether or not this is a good idea, we should at least acknowledge that our desire to eat meat is not a trivial matter, no mere ''gastronomic preference.'' We might as well call sex -- also now technically unnecessary -- a mere ''recreational preference.'' Whatever else it is, our meat eating is something very deep indeed.
that's what i want every "raw foodist" out there to think about: you are rejecting FIRE, one of man's first discoveries. seems a little extreme.
oh yeah, and these guys in the pic are stupid. sweaty, bad tattoos, ick.
wow, too bad none of you fools will go to that link a few posts below mine and read the michael pollan article. here's a good excerpt, from way near the end, where you never would have read all the way to:
The farmer would point out that even vegans have a ''serious clash of interests'' with other animals. The grain that the vegan eats is harvested with a combine that shreds field mice, while the farmer's tractor crushes woodchucks in their burrows, and his pesticides drop songbirds from the sky. Steve Davis, an animal scientist at Oregon State University, has estimated that if America were to adopt a strictly vegetarian diet, the total number of animals killed every year would actually increase, as animal pasture gave way to row crops. Davis contends that if our goal is to kill as few animals as possible, then people should eat the largest possible animal that can live on the least intensively cultivated land: grass-fed beef for everybody. It would appear that killing animals is unavoidable no matter what we choose to eat.
34% Middle-aged Cubicle Workers who fantasize about the 17 year old barista on their lunch break at Arby's.
33% Adolescent boys whose biggest insult is "fa**ot," and who probably won't come-out until they're almost killed while cruising a truck-stop in their early forties. They'll then turn into one of those creepy desperate guys who hits on 17 year old gay boys, and who stupid adolescent boys call "fa**ot".
33% Aging hipsters who work a job exactcly like any other Dilbert, shop at the same shops at the mall, listen to the same crappy indie bands that the City Pages critics rave about month after month (cus they dress up like sailors) but occasionally spike up their Casual Friday wardrobe with a vintage striped suit coat.
Therefore, these demographics reveal that the one trait these disparate groups have in common is their resentment that they're so secretly and seriously boring, and the fact that they always have to hide that fact. Which really makes them hate any type of people doing something cool and having fun who don't have to worry about that deep-dark-secret.
Subject: these two fuckers. Date: Apr 03 2007 12:38:13 PM Author: roland
these two fuckers are representative of everything wrong with critical mass. Maybe people would respect us if people associated with the "one less car" movement, those of us who have given up driving a car until a suitable alternative is presented, didn't get associated with fucknuts like this.
and to the people that don't believe global warming is real... why don't you go and lock yourself in your garage with the car on, that way you can prove how harmless massive amounts of carbon dioxide being pumped into a closed system really is. and no, it doesn't just float into space.
Subject: hey enviro man Date: Apr 03 2007 11:49:26 AM Author: clap shitty
"Also, there is no evidence that people are causing this SLIGHT increase in global temperature. Nor is there evidence it's rising the water tables (when ice melts in a glass does the glass overflow?)."
A majority of melting glaciers are on land. They are not icebergs. This is not Mr. Wizard, in which you explain our problems away with simple household analogies.
But hey, all you Modest Mouses can keep on floating on, high above the petty concerns of an overwhelmingly vast majority of environmental scientists. You got your own mind, the school of life and the college of self. You're the boss. South Park. etc.
Eating meat and being vegetarian both destroy rainforests. This planet will be around long after we've killed ourselves off. Have fun bitches. Meat, vegetarianism, bikes or Hummers..we've already reached the tipping point so it doesn't matter. Unless, of course, that chubby guy is sweating ethanol.
Subject: yuck. Date: Apr 03 2007 11:21:31 AM Author: care-o-line
is he about to blow him?
i'll run them both over with my car. that's two less [sic] assholes.
Being a vegatarian often does more harm than good...
http://www.nehbc.org/pollan2.html
Subject: Ecology Date: Apr 03 2007 10:36:09 AM Author: Envirnoment Man
The problem isn't hip young New Yorkers / Brooklynites driving cars. They don't drive cars. The problem is PEOPLE. There are too many people comsuming a finite resource. And the number keeps climbing every day. If you really care about "greenhouse gasses" tell the next woman you see with 6 kids she needs to give condoms a whirr. Free condoms in urban areas!
Also, there is no evidence that people are causing this SLIGHT increase in global temperature. Nor is there evidence it's rising the water tables (when ice melts in a glass does the glass overflow?). Nor is their evidence this warming is unusual. Nor is there evidence it's bad in any way. What's so bad about CO2? Isn't that what plants eat?
Subject: ha Date: Apr 03 2007 10:26:16 AM Author: whoah
haha
Subject: . Date: Apr 03 2007 10:06:37 AM Author: .
"but it IS the right thing to do -- ride bicycles and stop eating meat."
Or you could get an environmental-friendly car (electricity...). Meat is good, what you on about? Vegetarianism is for anoroexic chicks = huge DONT.
Subject: Grammar Date: Apr 03 2007 10:02:55 AM Author: Graham
Shouldn't it be "one fewer car"?
Subject: linton Date: Apr 03 2007 09:48:20 AM Author: no name McGirk
Your comment cracked me up--comic genius!
Subject: ugly Date: Apr 03 2007 09:37:13 AM Author: Not to mention...
The shite tattoos on the green-shirt guy may even be worse than Mr On-his-knees.
Subject: ew Date: Apr 03 2007 09:37:09 AM Author: james jameson
That's one of the grossest things I've ever seen
Subject: barf. Date: Apr 03 2007 08:28:22 AM Author: ...
Nobody has yet commented on the dirty great sweat patch on that fat guys green tshirt.
fukken grody.
Subject: and Date: Apr 03 2007 07:58:29 AM Author: DDD
Get your back waxed or something.
Subject: LOL Date: Apr 03 2007 07:57:45 AM Author: DDD
Why couldn't they afford cars? Riding a bike keeps you in shape. Driving around in cars to do anything is what makes so many americans overweight.
The real drama here is that the clothing they are wearing is vomit inducing.
Subject: ride him hard cowboy Date: Apr 03 2007 06:09:56 AM Author: lol@u
So all these losers ride bikes cause they could never afford a car... ok that's fine, in ny it's hard to afford a car for most people. but to try and turn that into some protest movement? that's funny. "yeah I'm saving the planet." no fuckhead you are just another poor loser. you want to really save the planet? kill yourself. there's no ecological footprint from a dead person.
Subject: I'm not a delicious crispy nugget Date: Apr 03 2007 05:31:38 AM Author: PETA
"but it IS the right thing to do -- ride bicycles and stop eating meat."
ugh... cry more.
I've seen so much evidence in contrary to the whole global warming thing I don't even know what the fuck to believe anymore. As for stopping eating meat, why?
Just to keep this on topic: I think as soon as an area becomes known for being trendy and fashionable (williamsburg), it then starts to attract the try-hards and it instantly becomes a bit of a characture of what it used to be, which is what we're seeing in this photo.
Subject: innit Date: Apr 03 2007 04:59:04 AM Author: innit
Good thing when he's older and a bit lazier nobody will see his protest. His shirt will cover the message as he's driving along to Burger King in a Buick.
Subject: one more Date: Apr 03 2007 03:35:38 AM Author: one more
water for cows
Subject: meat Date: Apr 03 2007 03:25:38 AM Author: kaspar
the production of meat (food for animals, methan from cows, processing the meat, cooling chain, ...) produces about 20% of all greenhouse gases...
Subject: human bicycle Date: Apr 03 2007 03:17:34 AM Author: linton h.
HE'S one less car? we're supposed to save the world by RIDING HIM?!
but it IS the right thing to do -- ride bicycles and stop eating meat.
How is not eating meat going to fuckin save the world. Thats the dumbest shit I have ever heard..!
now i'm off for a bacon sarnie...!!
Subject: shoes Date: Apr 03 2007 02:42:06 AM Author: Ich
Yeah, something like that. I think i like them. Succony or zuchinni or something.
But the people suck anyway.
Subject: What? Date: Apr 03 2007 01:53:42 AM Author: what
look at their shoes..what do you even call those suconny? something...
Subject: what have we hear Date: Apr 03 2007 01:49:02 AM Author: jees james
if that guys "body art" is a protest, he would be being more pro-active if it said "no more cunts".
Subject: baring his beastly shoulders Date: Apr 03 2007 01:46:37 AM Author: vik
whyd he tattoo that shit on his back. i'm tearing a little.
Subject: nope Date: Apr 03 2007 01:33:28 AM Author: ok then
sure, because if these people weren't cyclists they would be driving cars? I doubt any of the picture could afford insurance, same with 90% of other bike-activists, so they're really making no fucking difference whatsoever.
Subject: these guys in the pic Date: Apr 03 2007 01:10:59 AM Author: are retarded BUT
but it IS the right thing to do -- ride bicycles and stop eating meat.
sure the problems are huge. sure it's likely too late. but it doesn't mean we should stop doing the right thing.
lazy assholes who just make fun and "don't give a fuck" are the REAL gay fucking fags.
Subject: First Date: Apr 03 2007 12:20:06 AM Author: Poop Dick
for somewhat the same reason. However, Vice is right on.
Though I have no proof, I get the feeling this is a Puerto Rican East Village native who broke out of the idiot North Face/Rocawear mold and started her own thing. Darwin would be proud.
How awesome are dorks? It doesn’t even matter if that dude is a dude or not; when you see nerds that overcame all their wedgies and rhyming insults and can still go for it with stupid accessories and a boner, it reminds you that being 15 wasn’t all suffering anxiety. Some of it was pretty fucking fun.
Du 29 octobre au 11 novembre 2009 EXPO PROLONGÉE JUSQU'AU 29 NOVEMBRE
à la Galerie Chappe (Paris) Richard Kern, Maggie Lee, Peter Sutherland, Dana
Goldstein, Tim Barber, Martynka Wawrzyniak, Angela Boatwright, Jamie Taete,
Jonnie Craig... Plus d'infos...
