why do ALL girls look good in wet tshirts?

ugly girls don’t.

hannah is stunning

my arse looks good in a wet t-shirt

that Invasion T-Shirt RULES!

Hannah really does have great tits!

what was the point of this? vice, if tits are the answer to all of life’s questions, why don’t you just drop the facade and collaborate with nuts magazine?

JESUS people are uptight. HEY AMY!

Wow, the poor girls look cold!

if this was in nuts or the sun they wouldn’t of used such good t-shirts and the models would of probably melted.

Being of the male gender, I myself no finer past-time of an afternoon than the casual gawping at young girls front appendages.

That’s not to say I advocate this sort of thing. But it is marvellous.

I must say, however, that anyone who would complain about this has clearly come forth from the dark ages of time using some sort of witchcraft or sorcery. Cocks, tits, bottoms, arms, legs.. they all belong to human bodies.

BooB

I’d hardly call breasts appendages.

This is old hat, lets have some wet knickers showing the camel toe.

and in the same day where brooke shields gets taken out of the tate…

I would.

“An appendage in the broadest sense is an additional or subsidiary part existing on, or added to, something which can generally still function if the appendage has never existed or is later provided or grown, or will still perform a primary function if the appendage is removed.”

Yes Vice! More of this please

PS… congratulations on finding girls that all LOOK 16/17…

This is really….demeaning. However, what’s worse is the girls who think they are so hip taking their clothes off to get into vice. urghhh.

A little bit awkward with the topless stuff. Makes me feel funny.

i realy like white shirt girls wety and i like image that is nice

errr i don’t think anyone thinks they’re hip by ‘taking their clothes off to get in vice’. No-one took their clothes off…they’re just boobs dude. Chill.

white wet top competitions are not a bad idea,
but seriously? getting teenies from london who want to impress their internet buds and pals by showing a bit of underage nipple?
cant you at least get some “women”. Not kids that i have totally seen running around legless near whiteheat in soho.

when you’re in your twenties are you still a kid?some people are super offended by boobs but yet they…er…follow the vice blog??

People get over it. Have you never seen a fashion magazine most of them are full of tits! Art is full of tits too and I don’t mean artists and art dealers. I thought since the sixties everyone in the west was well into enjoying their bodies. I don’t mean to be rude to these girls but most of them look way older than 18 to me. Brook Shields is 10 in that picture, 10 and she’s naked and done up and meant to look slutty. These are just some pretty girls larking about in the park. These conservative types who don’t like bodies should probably go and bond with some islamic fundamentalists and not read VICE.

boobs are not offensive. i own a pair myself and have never been offended by them. however, the constant presence of them in vice is quite frankly BORING. don’t get me wrong, vice do some great articles, but they are strongly outweighed by the copious amounts of posh art student tits owned by girls who will take their clothes off for anyone who says he is a “photographer”. it detracts from the good stuff and makes vice no better than your average lads mag. if you’re going to celebrate the human form so much, whats wrong with plastering cocks and fat chicks all over your pages? surely that’s art too? oh i forgot. vice isn’t art. its wank material for sweaty palmed first year art students named sebastien.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiuHdUkuRi0

Apparently vice got the girls pissed and then cajoled them into doing it which I guess would explain why they look so awkward.
Seems like a pretty power nasty misogynistic thing to do really. I wonder if they let their guard down because the people at Vice seemed nice and not sleazy?
Apologies if my attitude sounds slightly un ‘cutting edge’ (you tell me vice!)
But these pics are not exactly groundbreaking from a fashion point of view. Back in the early 90’s when Corrine Day shot Kate Moss looking awkward and uncomfortable with her top off for vogue, Kate fell out with the photographer when she realised how exploited she had been. At least she didn’t have to read a blog in which men comment on her breasts afterwards.
I just hope they got paid, Kate moss certainly got paid and the girls in nuts and loaded definitely get paid. Lets just hope that vice doesn’t feel they have done these girls such an (um) favour that they don’t have to pay them!

Hey Vice. Have any of you got sisters?

Oi Vice, why don’t you get your cocks out ….. if you think your man enough

Billie JD isn’t 18, is she?

hannah is so smokingly hot shes a 9

I know at least one of these girls works for Vice, so she’s not exactly getting her tits out to get in to the magazine. And I’m going to take a guess that the rest of them aren’t simple airhead models, being chosen by Vice and all. Which means that they’re probably smart enough to have half decent views on this kind of thing. Beyond the simple dark-ages, overdone feminist philosophy that’s rearing up in the comments.

Also, guys getting their cocks out for the magazine is equivalent to women getting their vaginas out. We don’t have a semi-socially acceptable appendage to wave around. For us it’s all or nothing. You do; Live with it. If we did we’d probably flaunt it occasionally too.

Best way for girl’s boobs to be wet? No t-shirt, or any other clothes for that matter.

these ho’s aint got na tittays.
first of all, the t-shirt that makes the best wet t-shirt is the t-shirt with some big ass titays to fill it up.
this group of ho’s look like a bunch of pre-pubescent teen boys from dallas.
i’m dissaprove vice.
get some veluptuous ladies up in the wet titty contest.
damn.

There’s no styling involved in this

i had fun, hot day, free beer…enough said.

If nothing else I think this beautifully illustrates the lengths the middle class east London set will go to justify looking at some tits. Loaded, FHM, Nuts etc have been doing this for years. Hey, they even have articles and that. You know, about people firing guns and stuff. Just like you Vice.

I don’t have a problem with nudity in magazines, I have a problem with magazines using skinny, young girls looking uncomfortable.

wet knickers please.

Billie doesn’t have her tits out. Haven’t you seen the people who work at VICE do this to themselves: http://www.viceland.com/int/v15n8/htdocs/ass-invaders

All these girls knew they’d be asked to pose in wet t-shirts for days before the shoot. Why can’t people understand that in these post social networking, exhibitionist times a lot of us just like showing our bodies off. So what’s the problem? Women’s magazines have way more tits in them, none of these girls are anorexic and unlike in fashion magazines none of these girls are actually kids. What are you seeing here that you wouldn’t see on a French beach?

Why is everyone one a pretentious cock end? I did this shoot and to be honest I had not even heard of Vice before this…. Oh and by the way I am not a London teeny I’m from kent and i’m 28! Not everyone thinks that shoreditch is cool and hip…. in fact I think its just funny… Smile more people stop being so uptight and have a bloody laugh. This shoot was well funny to do and I would do it all over again. Lighten up smegging moody people you only live once! X

i am carole malone.

Did you pay them? Or was it such ‘a great day’ that you didn’t need to?

Yeah but Bex… did u actually flash your boobs? and if you did it again would you?

how much power to ‘trendy magazines’ have?
how much do they exploit that?
yes it happens in art and it happens in fashion but Toulouse le trec and Picasso didn’t have blogs.
If they did then I’m sure that some people would say that they were total arseholes.

Aha BEAR I spotted you!

Why are all these people getting so BBC4 on your ass?

As far as I’m concerned, no-one else should be concerned.

It looked like a fun day.

Everyone else is jealous.

Plus; hasn’t everybody who has written on this blog created ‘free’ *gasp* journalism for Vice?

Take a look in the mirror suckers, if you hate Vice so much, then stop fuelling them with what they thrive on… controversy.

And get back onto your Facebook.

And poke someone.

haha!cheers mantis,yea i’m baffled by the amount of controvery over a few nips…you’d think this was going on in ‘new scientist’ not ‘vice’ by the reactions of some people!

If vice ‘Thrives on controversy’ then why does anyone who has an opinion get accused of being BB4 or ‘new scientist’. Some people do actually read more than one magazine and then form their own opinions.
You can really hate a few pictures or an article in a magazine without hating the whole magazine.
Does Vice only want readers who want to be spoon fed everything they serve up for them?
This is obviously not about a “few nips”, it was about the girl in the picture (the bit that has now been cut) looking really uncomfortable and then being served up for a bunch of people to comment on.
That’s only controversial because it is so mean, like kicking a puppy. Surprised more people didn’t object, but quite a few did and it would be a bit of a coincidence if they all read ‘the new scientist’.

If she was so uncomfortable why did she do it, she sounds a bit of a twat. Wet t-shirts are old hat anyway, if Vice wants to be controversial then give us punters what we want- wet knickers with lots of camel toe, oh and girls who like to flash.

the roughest bunch of girls ive ever seen.
makes me want to be gay.

Hang on mate… it wasn’t her speaking . I just saw the picture and said she LOOKED uncomfortable and thought that was not very nice.
What I said dosn’t make her a twat, if you want to call someone a twat then call me a twat!
just google camel toes and wet knickers and you will find what you are looking for. Porn isn’t that hard to find, you don’t need to ask vice to publish it, its already there for you, your just looking in the wrong place.
and you are not “us punters” - who are just one person?

hm,shame no one got the point i was trying to make.

We can also get wet t-shirts on all the porn site too, why don’t you go to these sites and have your wank. There are many guys on here that have a different opinion than you, I am saying what they are thinking. Vice by doing these pix was going into the realms of porn. My point was if you are going to do that then be brave and do the wet knicker pix too, male or female.

yes I see what you mean - they could actually get some proper porn models to do it then and it wouldn’t look so uncomfortable. Reckon they would probably have to pay for proper porn though, but guess that shouldn’t be a prob what with all the Nike branding.

and don’t get Bears point as there doesn’t seem to be anyone called bear flashing their boobs.

so the long and short of it is that these girls got given free beer to enter a wet t-shirt contest…..a bit “ibiza uncovered” is it not? also, as someone else said, there is no styling. why the hell is this in the “fashion” section?

I think everyone here seems to be missing the point somewhat; Vice advertises on twitter or facebook or whatever for some students to be in a ‘fashion’ shoot. I mean why not, it’s easier than going to an agency and paying proper models. Plus, you’d need to clear any nudity in advance with the agency, and pay more. Get said student models drunk (pay them in beer - brilliant idea!) and persuade them to actually take their tops off. The nudity on the homepage generates loads of hits (art students need a wank too you know) and Vice wins.

Loads of hits by the right demographic and bigger brands want to be associated with you, for that ‘cool’ seal of approval. It can’t have escaped your attention that Playstation has been all over the website of late.

(BTW Vice and Playstation have the same PR company. Funny how Vice can pay for a big budget hi-end PR company but not pay for some models eh?)

I’m sorry people but you’ve all been fucking had. You’re not cool. Vice is a brand, like Coca Cola, McDonalds and Shell Oil. They want you to buy their stuff and spend as little money as possible themselves in the process.

I don’t know if you realise this - but you all sound like a bunch of middle aged Tory backbenchers! SAD!

THEY’RE JUST TITS! Anyone would’ve thought they’d gotten their rats out at the way you’re reacting!

Not models? That’s the point! JESUS CHRIST. Anyone would think this was the 50’s. Unfortunately for you bunch of Richard Wilsons (and you’d better believe this) people these days can do what they want when they want. That includes girls getting their baps out, or taking photos of said girls with their baps out. Oh, I’m sorry - I forgot they did the shoot AT GUNPOINT!

You didn’t get naked.. you weren’t the subject of this photoshoot.. SO WHAT’S YOUR PROBLEM?! You think these girls need you to fight their battles for them?! Oh those poooor defenceless girls! GET REAL! You’re a pussy typing a bunch of meaningless pseudo-critical bullshit at home on the internet! Those chicks are out there living their lives!

GET OVER IT!

If I have to read any more of this snivelling, middle-class bullshit I’m gonna PUKE!!!

Models are rarely paid for Editorial in any of the style press. The models were asked to be in this days before the shoot.

From what I heard the girls were in the pub before the shoot. Have you seen how much nudity there is in VICE? Or the pictures of fat almost naked gay boys? Or the VICE staff members rodgering themselves with dildos?

Have you not seen most of the style press is full of gay bondage porn and ‘tasteful’ pictures of fannies and tits.

Sorry I know it’s letting down your narrow frigid impression of womanhood but these girls wanted to do this. No one forced them.

We all want to have sex, we love it, it’s probably not always 100% healthy but there you go and yes we know there’s loads of companies want us to boy their shit, but do you know a magazine without advertising? This was a funny way to sell t-shirts that was bound to be seen by loads of people, that’s why it’s fashion. Other ‘high fashion’ style magazines are always strapping people up in bondage gear isn’t promoting gimping more sick?Communist fashion doesn’t work tends to result in Moist cultural revolutions where everybody gets killed for not being right on enough.

The PR jibe seems fair enough but that’s nothing to do with tits. VICE is always calling stuff out for its bullshit. Vice is super fucking liberal. Isn’t that why it’s full of tits? Be against corruption or totalitarianism or something and let us fuck all we want. By the way all the people who object to this - can’t have been reading Vice for the last few years because it’s full of this sort of stuff. Hey actually do you know what, I bet ‘New Scientist Reader’ and ‘Rose’ really hates gay magazines, they must hate all the gay press. They must hate Butt and Attitude and QX because those mags are full of people getting naked for the love of being looked at, full of sexual organs and discussions about sex. Hey so ‘Rose’ and ‘New Scientist Reader’ which bits of the gay press do you approve of? Or are you against it?

Isn’t it style to have the best looking camel toe.

hmmmm, wonder why Jesus Christ got so vexed by comments here.
Did you read the comment above by ‘New scientist’ ?
No one is really talking about breasts any more as the pic of the girl who looked really uncomfortable holding her Tshirt up has been removed and that kind of speaks for itself.
What is being discussed now is that fact that Vice must make a huge amount of money through plugging Nike and Deisel etc and that it can afford to pay a big budget PR company. Therefor its recruitment methods could be seen as being slightly suspect and not paying people could be seen as being slightly rude.
All just ideas being put out there in a pretty polite manner. Surely getting angry and throwing your rattle out of your pram is tantamount
to an admission of guilt.

Hee hee Wouldn’t it be great if Tory backbenchers started challenging magazines and big brands, and started doing it in a polite way.. not just by growling and throwing insults around.

hey stylepress - just saw your comment and you sound pretty reasonable. Don’t think the problem was ever with tits or dicks or sex. It was with a girl holding her Tshirt up and looking really uncomfortable. I was hoping to be proved wrong and told that it was good acting and she was fine, but that didn’t happen and the picture is now gone.
Dont think anyone was saying they hate Vice or any other magazine. It was really talking about one picture, one spontaneous picture that could be great if one of the girls in it didn’t look so totally cringe-worthy uncomfortable.
And relaxing in the pub is all very well, but don’t Vice own the pub?

hahaha i was the girl ‘looking uncomfortable holding my t-shirt up’…..who the hell has the right to say i was uncomfortable in doing that? why would i do something i felt uncomfortable in doing? i love’d it! all these comments are a pile of wank!

so yeah… dark ages….you are proved wrong? im fine..? and i guess it was good acting? hmm

Yes well, I’m a bit confused now. Think I probably should have stopped blogging after the picture got removed. If I offended anyone in the pics then obviously didn’t mean to. This has all gone a bit slim shady now tho so gonna finally sign off for good

ha!I was in the now deleted photo also (yes, sometimes people don’t use their actual names for commenting, aplogies if your mother Christened you ‘Dark Ages’…tough break) and I agree with Hannah that these comments are mainly balls.

which Hannah do u agree with, the one that was fine or the one that wasn’t?

Why was the picture deleted if everyone in it was happy?

Carlotta Looks Great:0

Hey Stylepress, I completely approve of the gay press, it’s 100 times more honest and open about things than nearly all the straight press. Possibly something to do with the fact that as has been shown above, most straight people are a touch uptight. I mean how do you have any idea whether I’m straight or gay, into bondage, wet t-shirts or watersports? The whole blog seemed to be descending into people being incredibly angry about whether it was OK for some girls to get their tits out or not. The point I was trying to make, but was clearly being a touch too elliptical for some (I mean Jesus H Christ - for fuck’s sake pal - do you not even know the difference between right and left wing politics?) was that Vice magazine is, at the end of the day, a business. It needs to make money to survive, and we’re all just coal for the fucking fire.

I have a lot of respect for Vice and what it does, which is why I’m “calling them out” on this. Can’t you question things or are you all so blindly brand loyal that you’ll let them get away with anything? I think that if Vice makes money from these women then they should be paid. The whole situation SEEMED a bit too seedy for me. I mean you’ve got to admit, the concept of young looking, slim white girls looking a bit vulnerable in wet t-shirts is a bit iffy. When you add in the fact they were taken down the pub and gotten pissed first the whole thing smacks of a big ole power trip.

Having said that it seems that everyone in the shoot seems 100% happy with the arrangement, the inane bickering has died down, and I need to be careful not to get stuck in a tits discussion ever again. Fuck people get ANGRY.

Just for interest though; hey Vice! Why did you take the picture down?

They were afraid they might have just stepped over the line on exploitation, which in turn may have had a long term effect on their business. After all they are all greedy bastards who don’t pay their writers, hell they even want all their intern to work for fuck all, that’s how hip and stylish they really are.

im sorry, i must be blind, but at what point do any of them look awkward or uncomfortable?

if only they had boobs.

More important do any of these tit less freaks have a camel toe?

So Vice, getting back to the question at hand, WHICH FUCKING T-SHIRT MAKES THE BEST WET T-SHIRT?! We need an answer over here!

Also great tits girls, thanks.

I went to it cos i thought yuuummm, young fun girls in wet tee shirts, that’ll be nice to see and it nearly was but even the pic’s left, (i didn’t see the other one), they don’t look that comfy in, so it wasn’t that great.
Amazing how many people got into blogging about it. My instant reaction was the awkwardness not the yummy girls.
Although the first pic is really cool where they’re running.

Christopher can be found at the swimming pool ogling the wet costumes of the tit less little girls. Vice if you’re going to give us wet t-shirts at least give us tits that fill out the t-shirt.

Congrats on treating women like objects yet again.

GOTTA LOVE SOCIETY.

I hope these stupid girls go choke on a dick before they can drive their gender even further into the ground.

Once again the comments section is a parade of irritating, pointless bleating. Shut, the, fuck, up.

“Ohh god, some girls in wet t-shirts! Time to shit my over-opinionated pants spew my half-baked, ill-informed assumptions and muddled use of the English language everywhere for the seventh time today!”

“I’m an internet white knight protecting adult women from their own bodies! I’m so into the rights of women that I’m on the internet assuming they’re too young or too stupid or weak to make their own choices. Watch me decrying the horror of it all while I unknowingly argue with the very women from the shoot about how exploitative it really is.

My second rate arts degree and out-of-the-biodegradable-box liberal attitude has granted me such powers of perception, I can tell this magazine I read avidly is all just an cynical charade of underhand exploitation, which is why I fucking read it all the time.”

What an embarrassment. Fuck off.

Billie JD isn’t 18, she’s 20.

i fucking love tits

they are so annoying though !

It’s just a really shit shoot though isn’t it?

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with showing breasts, but i agree with ‘It’s just a really shit shoot though isn’t it?’ The girls look way too young and way too uncomfortable.

You guys missed a crucial element of the wet t-shirt contest… Tits. What is this, fucking amateur hour?

Sooo… what’s so good about hannah? she looks like a boring bimbo with acne. Carlotta looks like a camel.

not really, i think you girls all look pretty nice. What my point is, if you don’t want to be scrutinised/judged dont allow topless pictures of yourself on the internet.

This is a fashion shoot? The T shirts look as shapeless as the girls. There are more photographers in London than plumbers and this is the best you can do Vice?

im fine with the wet t-shirt thing bt u could have got some older girls to do it, some of them don’t look legal

this is hardly misogynistic nor exploitative being as TWO GIRLS were responsible for the styling and plaaning of the shoot. GET OVER IT PEOPLE ITS GREAT!