OFFENSIVE T-SHIRTS ARE THE AMERICAN WAY

Few things are more American than t-shirts and pissing people off for no reason. Combining the two is a long-held national pastime that makes baseball seem about as exciting as sniffing Ben Franklin’s beer farts. So I decided to have some fun testing the limits of every American’s inalienable right to conceptualize offensive ideas and pay someone to print them on t-shirts.

My aim was to create garments that the majority of the US citizenry would find offensive and, more specifically, submit designs so despicable that most custom-tee printers would refuse to print them. Still, my ultimate goal was to find a willing printer and get the shirts made no matter what. Mark Twain, perhaps the quintessential American author, once wrote: “Nature knows no indecencies; man invents them.” Each entrepreneur who refused my business would define yet another instance of American indecency and chip away at the bedrock of liberty as we know it.

I began by setting some guidelines: The topics of racism, sexism, and politics were deemed too easy for this exercise, primarily because online retailers already provide a bountiful selection of knee-jerk schlock marketed to college students and bigots. I also afforded myself the luxury of ratcheting up the viciousness of the shirt designs if the printer proved too eager to accept the initial unseemly idea.

I am happy to report that the First Amendment prevailed and every one of my ideas—even when pushed past the limits of my own morals and common sense—was eventually affixed to a t-shirt for around $20 a pop (except for one pricy exception). Sure, it took enduring a little verbal abuse and a bit of shopping around, but I believe our forefathers would be proud that even today the combined forces of capitalism and free speech triumph over America’s prudish moral quibbles.






Comments

Anonymous, on Aug 22, 2010 wrote:
Make one for that Islam church that is being built down the street from where that one thing happened that one time like 10 years ago.
That’d be like so funny.
Anonymous, on Jul 19, 2010 wrote:
I love how you deconstructed the first amendment, or, at least, deconstructed how people abuse this amendment in our days.
People think just because there is freedom of speech, they are free to do whatever they want.
I would just like to point out that those who did not find this funny and found it offensive that this is how many people feel about satirical remarks on god, religion, jesus, and more recently the prophet Mohammed.
Anonymous, on Jul 15, 2010 wrote:
Next segment is you wearing those shirts around town.
Anonymous, on Jul 14, 2010 wrote:
not a single Ku Klux Klan or Death Metal Scat Porn shirt????(like Waco Jesus) nothing offensive here... move along.. move along... nothing to see
Anonymous, on Jul 14, 2010 wrote:
Since when has did offensive mean funny? Right on!
Anonymous, on Jul 14, 2010 wrote:
yes
Anonymous, on Jul 14, 2010 wrote:
i’m all for humor that may be widely regarded as offensive but none of this is actually funny.
would you still have done this if your parents/best friend/coke dealer was killed in 9/11?
Anonymous, on Jul 13, 2010 wrote:
not funny duuuuude
Anonymous, on Jul 11, 2010 wrote:
Didn’t laugh once
Anonymous, on Jul 10, 2010 wrote:
haha There are also some good ones I saw on Make Me Laugh Shirts com , mainly sayings. good stuff none the less
G Head, on Jul 9, 2010 wrote:
This is by far one of the coolest things ever. I love the Haiti one!
Anonymous, on Jul 8, 2010 wrote:
3rd the child porn shirt assertion.

pansies
thepies, on Jul 8, 2010 wrote:
I laughed out loud. Especially at the fact that Mother Theresa getting rammed from behind is on a ONESIE. Brilliant!
Ross DeVille, on Jul 8, 2010 wrote:
Shit.
Someone has got to say it: that Papyrus on the 9/11 is fucking offensive.
Anonymous, on Jul 7, 2010 wrote:
was that a come back? Go masturbate into a trucker hat over your Banksy book, poseur.
Anonymous, on Jul 7, 2010 wrote:
man someone must have posted this to the muppet babies forum over at pimplyfacedfatsos.com. get a life fags.
Anonymous, on Jul 7, 2010 wrote:
Fuck your autoplay shit.First and last time visiting your site.
Anonymous, on Jul 7, 2010 wrote:
Your site sucks balls. Who the fuck puts embedded autoplaying videos at the bottom of the webpage other than a complete dickhead.
Anonymous, on Jul 7, 2010 wrote:
Yeah, those t-shirts suck. Your stoned interviewers are not funny. And if you want a really offensive shirt, try some pictures of sea turtles soaked in oil and burned alive, you spoiled skateboarding trash humpers.
Anonymous, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
Good work!!!
lovey, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
9/11 shirt is HAWTTTTT
Anonymous, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
My 10 week old needs that fucking onesie.
Anonymous, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
now do one for the second amendment
Anonymous, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
Yessum, this is hillarious. But, yeah, I think the next step would be actually wearing them.
Anonymous, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
Anonymous, on Jul 5, 2010 wrote:
Bet you can’t get a shirt displaying child porn printed.

THIS
Peer-pressure, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
@Dante Tung, another interesting experiment would be you confronting yo momma with wanting to sodomize her on live webcam because you were making a crucial pseudo-academic point to your internetfriends and really really needed her to just bend over and trust you as the grown man you are. ’Gee mom! You NEVER take ANY of my work seriously!’
Peer-pressure, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
Just when you start thinking that maybe americans are cool after all and try and remember why you thought they were lame, something like this pops into my webbrowser.
leifhalverson, on Jul 6, 2010 wrote:
I’ve never laughed more, best article ever
Anonymous, on Jul 5, 2010 wrote:
Thanks for the boreplanation Noam Chomsky! Now go fuck yourself with a roman candle.
Dante Tung, on Jul 5, 2010 wrote:
Although the Haiti and 9/11 t-shirts are funny and I would like to order a nine of each for my corporate softball team, the assertion that any of this implicates the First Amendment, the Constitution, or even the notion of free speech is wrong. It is impossible for private individuals or private entities (e.g. t-shirt printers) to infringe upon another’s First Amendment right to free speech; only a state actor can do so. A more interesting experiment from both a sociological and constitutional law perspective would be to wear the 9/11 t-shirt into a New York police station or firehouse and see how that pans out.
Next 30 comments >

POST A COMMENT [SIGN IN]
Hi, in case you haven't heard, you can now sign up to become a "member" of Viceland.com, which entitles you to all sorts of amazing benefits like pictures and a nickname. Click here to make your own profile. You can still comment if you don't, but you gotta do it all 'nonymously.

Name:
Comment: